Laserfiche WebLink
--� <br />—� <br />Variar�c�; ��pticatiQn �#arrative Attachment D <br />Curt and Heather Dubbetdee <br />As a young married couple, like most families, we wanted to purchase our first <br />home. When we found our home on Victoria Street, it was in raugh shape, havin� been <br />abandoned for over a year. However, the potentiat of this property was obvious. The <br />presentation of the U-shaped drive on an expansive front yard leads to a rambler hame <br />nested back from the busy street and shaded by well-established trees. We knew there <br />was much work to be done but with some years of constructian/ remodeling experience <br />between the two of us and the reference of a carpenter father, ��e took the leap and <br />purchased our first home. It has been exactly one year, and we love aur home. We have <br />gutted and remodeled two bedrooms and have just begun our next roam. One of our other <br />anticipated summer projects was to expand the cunent one-car garage into a two-car <br />garage. Since the rambler style house spans most of the width of the property, we were <br />required to file a"set-back" permit ta allow the addition to end three feet from the <br />property line (rather than the usual five feet code}. This permit raised the city's awareness <br />that our property cunently exceeds the impervious surface code by 4%, and would <br />naturally increase slightly with the 200 sq. ft. garage addition. <br />This brings us to the present narrative to support a variance on the code <br />established in 1999, stating that impervious surface shall not exceed 30%. To reduce the <br />amount of impervious surface to code, it was recommended that we eliminate the curve <br />portion of our U-shaped driveway. The following paragraphs lay out arguments for <br />mainta.ining the drive��ay, and allowing this property to remain incompliant with the <br />impervious code. <br />We would first like to address the goal of the code, which is ta reduce the amount <br />of water run-off into the cities drainage system. There are two reasons why we currently <br />do not contribute to this problem. First, our property sits below the street level causing <br />the city's portion of land between our property and the street to incline, which forces all <br />run-off back into our green space. Second, our driveway and property is extremely flat so <br />that any water on the driveway flows onto our green space and any water on our green <br />space remains there and drains into our soil. To nate: The garage addition would contain <br />a gutter system forcing all water fallin� an that impervious surface to drain onto the <br />sandy soil in our backyard. <br />Another issue to be addressed, regarding our driveway, is safety. Cunently, all <br />vehicles (including long work trucks with trailers} are free to exit the property in a <br />forward motion thanks to the U-shaped driveway. If farced to eliminate the secand, <br />curved portion, of the drive vehicles would have to consistently reverse onto Victoria <br />Street and be responsible for watching three directions of vehicles (see fig. 1). The U- <br />shaped driveway permits vehicles to reverse out of the garage, and then drive forward <br />around the curve to exit safely onto Victoria Street. <br />