Laserfiche WebLink
���r�ance E�pplicatfo� Narrati�=e Attachment D <br />C�urt artd Heather I�ubbelc��� <br />Victoria Street <br />(Traffic both directions} <br />* � * � <br />—► = Direction of Traffic <br />�` = Large Trees <br />* = Other well-established <br />Trees & shrubbery <br />/1 <br />� <br />Grandvie«� Street <br />Figure 1. Diagram af danger reversing aut of driveway onto Victoria Street. <br />After examining the property, eliminating the curve portion of the driveway <br />(leaving only a straight drive �etween the road and garage} would reduce the impervious <br />surface to 27%. However, a turn-around area was considered aceeptable by the city. <br />Creating a turn-around area would cause us to eliminate two trees and one bush near the <br />house (see fig. 1), and would add at least 300 sq. ft., which would then bring the <br />impervious surface ta 30%. Now, we are back to the reason we are faced with this <br />variance, which is the garage addition, which would bring the impervious surface to 32°io <br />and basicaily back ta it's current state at 34%. I hope it is obvious that this would be too <br />much labar and way to costly for the actual reduction in impervious surFace. If the <br />driveway ��vere left alone, the garage addition would increase the impervious surface from <br />34% to 36%. Therefore, we could either spend $7,500 to tear up the driveway, take down <br />trees, seed the grass, add a turn-around surface, and build the garage addition, decreasing <br />the impervious surface by 2%. Or, we could spend $3,500 on the garage addition and <br />increase the impervious surface by 2%, still continuing to not contribute to the cities <br />drainage averload. <br />Thank you far taking the time to examine our variance application. We look <br />forward to hearing the thoughts of the city staff and Variance Board, and hope that we <br />can work together to create a plan that will benefit the City of Roseville and all <br />individuals involved. <br />-.. –� <br />