pf07-026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� 4.0 PROPOSAL REVIEW: � = 4.1 Rosedale Commons Shopping Center has a Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning . map designation of SC, Shopping Center. The Address Map Book distributed by the -+ Community Development Department indicates the property is zoned Planned Unit � Development, however Planning Staff review of historical documents concludes that the !� property is incorrectly identified and is actually zoned Shopping Center District (February - 11, 1985, Ordinance No. 967). � <> 4.2 The property owner, Rosedale Commons LP, seeks approval for a"pet and pet supply ��? store" within Rosedale Commons Shopping Center. Comp USA has or will be vacating � � their tenant space within the Center and PetSmart desires to occupy the 25,870 sq. ft. i, space and operate a facility which would include a pet and pet supply retail area, �_� veterinary health area, pet hotel/doggie day care, grooming area and training area. i -. 1; 5.0 � f� 6.1 �- i1 19 �r� ,� , -, _, ,� ,; , c, REVIEW of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a Conditional Use Permit: a. Impact on traffic b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous properties d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan �', 5.2 Because the subject site is an existing retail center with ample parking, established -� ingress/egress, and other site improvements required when the Center was initially ��? approved by the City (January 14, 1985) and because no site improvements are requested ��! nor required for PetSmart to occupy the premises, the City Planner has determined that ; I review of such a request is unique in the context of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �? criteria. Further, the potential impacts of the Center far outweigh those of a single use __ such as PetSmart. That being said, staff has reviewed/analyzed the proposal utilizing the ;� criteria of Section 1013.01 of the City Code. ;� ; �, ;- ;� ; �� a�� �i -t � �� -t-� 5.3 Traffic. The DRC has concluded that the impacts created by a change in use (computer store to a pet store) would be negligible. Our experience is that these uses (former and proposed) generate similar volumes and peak hour movements. That being said the 2004, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on County Road B2 was 18,100 and on Fairview Avenue it was 15,500. PF07-026_RCA_061807.doc Page 2 of 4