Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />� <br />� <br />• Right turn lanes at County Road B and Snelling, on both east and west legs of the <br />intersection. <br />• New signal at the Skillman/ Har Mar/ Snelling Avenue intersection: The east and <br />west legs of the signal at Har Mar and Snelling are under City of Roseville <br />jurisdiction. Half of the cost of this new signal will be the responsibility of the City <br />of Roseville. <br />6.10 Upon receipt of the Har Mar PUD applications, staff discussed with Mn/Dot the potential <br />to shift the Skillman/ Har Mar/ Snelling Avenue 100 feet south on the east side of <br />Snelling. This would line up the Har Mar entrance with Skillman Avenue on the west <br />side of Snelling, eliminating some vehicle conflicts as well as providing more contiguous <br />parking for the HarMar center. The demolition of the existing building on the east side of <br />the intersection presented an excellent opportunity to address these concerns. Staff has <br />met with impacted property owners, Har Mar , and City Council regarding this proposal. <br />Much of the feedback that we have received regarding this proposed intersection <br />improvement has not been supportive. As a result of this as well as timing and financial <br />considerations, we are not recommending that we move forward with this intersection <br />relocation at this time. We will have additional discussion regarding this intersection <br />when the second Har Mar PUD application is brought to the Planning Commission in <br />December. <br />STAFF COMMENT — PLANNING DIVISION: <br />6.11 Section 1005.015 lists the permitted and conditional uses within the SC zone. Retail and <br />a Restaurant Class I- Traditional (no liquor), III - Traditional (3.2 beer and wine and <br />strong beer), and IV - Traditional (full service bar) are permitted uses. <br />6.12 Section 1006.04B defines 24 hour use, which reads: Twenry four (24) hour uses as <br />defined by Section 1002. 02 of this title shall be permitted uses in the S-C Shopping <br />Center District but uses within three hundred feet (300) of a residential district shall be <br />subject to the additional performance standards as indicated below. A significant change <br />in the regular hours of operation of any existing use to twenty four (24) hours located <br />within three hundred feet (300') of a residential district constitutes an expansion and <br />intensification of the use and shall require modification of the plan and improvements to <br />the site in compliance with the standards specified below for twenty four (24) hour uses. <br />(Ord. 1234, 12-15-1999, eff. 1-1-2000) <br />6.13 Section 1002.02 (Twenty-Four Hour Uses) states: Any commercial use that is regularly <br />open for business or involves other significant, outdoor activity during any hour beriveen <br />ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. (Ord. 1234, 12-IS-1999, eff. 1-1- <br />2000) <br />PF07-053_RCA_112607.doc Page 6 of 13 <br />