My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-05-21_HRA_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-05-21_HRA_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2013 10:20:27 AM
Creation date
6/19/2013 10:20:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/21/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, May 21, 2013 <br />Page 5 <br />1 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka, Ms. Bujold reviewed some of the things other communities <br />2 <br />were using for financial incentives, including some developments occurring in both Downtown <br />3 <br />Minneapolis and St. Paul without funding, with market paying for the property and buildings, <br />4 <br />even though some of those may have had some tax increment financing (TIF) assistance (e.g. <br />5 <br />Apple Valley, 322 unit, 20% affordable units). <br />6 <br />7 <br />Further discussion ensued regarding how and when TIF was available or property <br />8 <br />improvements; a brief review of the PennAmerica project in Bloomington (South of <br />9 <br />Southtown site), with their HRA participating in acquiring the parcel, a major redevelopment <br />10 <br />for the City for funding clean-up from converted commercial uses and subsidizing the product <br />11 <br />for the market place. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Ms. Bujold reported that the PennAmerica product came in at approximately $1.80/square <br />14 <br />foot; and if they hadn’t received some financial incentives to help with the land and its clean- <br />15 <br />up, it would have put the units out of reach. Ms. Bujold advised that rates were going at $2.00 <br />16 <br />to $2.10/square foot in Downtown Minneapolis, but noted that suburban areas hadn’t gotten to <br />17 <br />that level yet. <br />18 <br />19 <br />Ms. Kelsey requested that Ms. Bujold respond to her observations in attending the last CDI <br />20 <br />meeting for the Dale Street/Fire Station parcels; and comments of developers attending that <br />21 <br />meeting and current rates in Roseville dictating the overall rent range in the community; and <br />22 <br />how to take that estimated rate of $1.00/square foot, and Ms. Bujold’s recommendation to <br />23 <br />incentivize something at the $1.40/square foot range. <br />24 <br />25 <br />Ms. Bujold reported that the developer, Mr. Ron Buell, had looked at rents around their <br />26 <br />specific property, and seemed willing to accept a certain amount of risk in their development; <br />27 <br />noting that they had a strong history of developing affordable properties, and had done so in <br />28 <br />numerous states around the country, a niche that they were very familiar and comfortable with; <br />29 <br />and was in terms of their risk to move from an existing rent to an additional $100 to $150 more <br />30 <br />per month. However, to move from that level to an additional $300 to $350 more per month, <br />31 <br />Ms. Bujold advised, as Mr. Buell had stated, that would require them to accept more risk, and <br />32 <br />it remained easier for them to stay at the more comfortable range to ensure a successful project <br />33 <br />rather than making that extreme leap into an area where they were more unsure of the <br />34 <br />outcome. <br />35 <br />36 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka, Ms. Bujold addressed land write-downs, and whether she had <br />37 <br />seen any HRA’s acquiring land and leasing it to developers as a write –down; and questioned <br />38 <br />if this would cause problems for financing the lease for the developer. Ms. Bujold advised that <br />39 <br />it could create some problems depending on how the write-down was done, and she usually <br />40 <br />observed it with a sale versus lease arrangement. Ms. Bujold advised that land write-downs <br />41 <br />were note used much around this area, but are successful in other situations such as educational <br />42 <br />institutions, and sometimes for office space or housing, depending on the desire of the land <br />43 <br />owner to retain ownership of the land, but allow a certain use on it. Ms. Bujold advised that <br />44 <br />there were some land leases for on retail development in Edina; but questioned if land leases <br />45 <br />for residential would work well, as they were unusual. <br />46 <br />47 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted the study’s recommendation for Roseville to achieve higher rents, but <br />48 <br />difficult since new products were lacking. With rents currently so low in Roseville, Ms. <br />49 <br />Kelsey advised that developers were not comfortable taking large risks. Ms. Kelsey suggested <br />50 <br />that, with the Dale site owned by the HRA, they consider what amenities would be competitive <br />51 <br />to bring the site up to a level of competition in the neighborhood, with other complexes (e.g. <br />52 <br />Palisades and recent renovations and swimming pool installation); and questioned whether a <br />53 <br />similar property would fit in the Dale Street site. <br />54 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.