Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, March 6, 2013 <br />Page 4 <br />people were doing, but to know if and when they held an event that they had the proper <br />149 <br />signage for a certain period of time. If an event was added or changed, Mr. Paschke <br />150 <br />advised that it simply required communication with staff through the proper channels and <br />151 <br />following the process. <br />152 <br />Mr. Hartman advised that he would meet with staff, along with others using the building, <br />153 <br />to address issues of the V.F.W. <br />154 <br />Chair Boerigter closed the Public Hearing at approximately 6:53 p.m. <br />155 <br />MOTION <br />156 <br />Member Olsen moved, seconded by Member Boguszewski to recommend to the <br />157 <br />City Council APPROVAL of the proposed TEXT AMENDMENT, as outlined in the <br />158 <br />staff report dated March 6, 2013, for Table 1010-2 and Section 1010.07 Temporary <br />159 <br />Signs. <br /> <br />160 <br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />161 <br />Nays: 0 <br />162 <br />Motion carried. <br />163 <br />Anticipated City Council action is scheduled for March 25, 2013. <br />164 <br />b. PROJECT FILE 0017 <br />165 <br />Request by the Planning Division for approval of ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS to <br />166 <br />the “materials” of Sections 1005, 1006, 1007, and 1008 to better specify that <br />167 <br />prefabricated, exterior, “tip-up” panels or pre-cast concrete panels shall be pre- <br />168 <br />colored or stained.” <br />169 <br />Chair Boerigter opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0013 at about 6:55 p.m. <br />170 <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed the request for a text amendment to <br />171 <br />clarify textured precast concrete panels, and that they be pre-colored or stained, not <br />172 <br />painted, as detailed in the staff report dated March 6, 2013. <br />173 <br />Chair Boerigter closed the Public Hearing at approximately 7:00 p.m., with no one <br />174 <br />appearing to speak for or against. <br />175 <br />MOTION <br />176 <br />Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Gisselquist to recommend to the <br />177 <br />City Council APPROVAL of the proposed TEXT AMENDMENT, as outlined in the <br />178 <br />staff report dated March 6, 2013, and which will be inserted with the “materials” <br />179 <br />section of the Commercial and Mixed Use Districts (Section 1005); Employment <br />180 <br />Districts (Section 1006), Institutional District (Section 1007); and the Park and <br />181 <br />Recreation District (Section 1009) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance; <br />amended as <br />182 <br />follows: <br />183 <br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />184 <br />Nays: 0 <br />185 <br />Motion carried. <br />186 <br />Anticipated City Council action is scheduled for March 25, 2013. <br />187 <br />6. Other Business: Discuss potential revisions to how outdoor storage is defined and <br />188 <br />regulated and where outdoor storage is allowed <br />189 <br />Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd initiated this discussion for potential revision to how outdoor <br />190 <br />storage is defined and/or regulated and where the outdoor storage is allowed, with current <br />191 <br />language allowing for conflict and a lack of distinction, as detailed in the staff report dated March <br />192 <br />6, 2013. Staff sought comment from the Commission to the questions they put forward in Section <br />193 <br />2 of the staff report. <br />194 <br />Chari Boerigter opined that he could not imagine anyone thinking that having vehicles stored <br />195 <br />outside should be prohibited when outdoor vehicles sales was allowed. If you were permitted to <br />196 <br />sell them, Chair Boerigter opined that you should be able to have them stored outside, and there <br />197 <br />should be no screening required for that. <br />198 <br /> <br />