Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />• • <br />� 5.2 This Conditional Use Pernlit (CUP) request has been prompted by the applicant's desire <br />� to construct a 960-square-foot detached garage. Section 1004A1A3 (General Residential <br />.. District Requirements) of the City Code limits the size of an accessory structure to 864 <br />. square feet; City Code � 1004.01 A4 (Requirements for Increased Size), however, allows <br />: for larger structures up to 1,008 square feet with a CUP. <br />� 5.3 In a letter responding to the initial submission, Community Development staff informed <br />�% Mr. Zack that, by virtue of the date of the submission of application materials and the <br />� schedule of public meetings, a final approval or denial could not be provided within 60 <br />��+ days. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes (§15.99), the letter also noted that the City would <br />��'� need to extend the review time to avoid running afoul of the action deadline. <br />�� '� 6.0 STAFF COMMENTS: <br />,2 <br />13 <br />i4 <br />i5 <br />16 <br />i7 <br />13 <br />:9 <br />�0 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />6.1 Section 1004.01 AS (Overall Area) of the City Code states that the combined floor area <br />"of attached garage and detached accessory building(s) shall not exceed the exterior <br />dimensional footprint of the principal structure, excluding any attached garage <br />footprint." The only garage space on the property is in the existing detached structure, <br />which would be replaced by the proposed 960-square-foot accessory building, whereas <br />the footprint of the principal building is in excess of 1,100 square feet. <br />6.2 The area of the subject property is approximately 24,825 square feet; � 1004.O1A6 <br />(Maximum Total Surface Area) of the City Code permits up to 7,450 square feet of <br />impervious coverage on a lot this size. Existing impervious surfaces cover about 2,100 <br />square feet, and the proposed detached garage would increase the total impervious <br />coverage about 3,500 square feet (14% of the total lot area), even if the driveway were <br />expanded to twice its current size. <br />24 6.3 It is probable that the driveway will be widened to some degree, although a driveway <br />25 expansion is not indicated on the site plan. And while any such expansion is outside of <br />2i; the scope of the CUP application, a permit will be required at the time of paving. <br />27 7.0 REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA <br />28 7.1 Section 1013.01 (Conditional Use Permits) of the City Code requires the Planning <br />29 Commission and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a CUP <br />30 application: <br />31 a. Impact on traffic; <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />b. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffc circulation, landscaping, and <br />structures with contiguous properties; <br />d. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and <br />f. Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />38 7.2 lmpact on traffic: The Planning Division has deternuned that an increase in traffic <br />39 volume, due to the size of the proposed 960-square-foot accessory structure on the <br />40 property, is unlikely. <br />PF07-029 RCA 072306 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />