My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-014
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 2:25:27 PM
Creation date
6/19/2013 3:43:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-014
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
--� <br />.-.. <br />2. Characterization of Declining Inner-City Neighbourhoods <br />2.1. General Geographic Models of Decline <br />The period since the early 1960s has, for many central cities, been marked by <br />dramatic decline in both the social and physical infrastructure of inner-city <br />neighbourhoods. Areas that once had thriving businesses and strong communities have <br />been transformed into neighbourhoods with abandoned buildings and jobless residents <br />(Wilson 1987, 1996; Jargowsky 1996; Koebel 1996; Madden 2�0; Cohen 2001; CMHC <br />2001; Lynn and McGeary 1990; Smith 1973; Jones 1979; Robson 1988; Carley 1990; <br />Glennerster et al. 1999; Randolph and Judd 1999; Townsend 1987). <br />Among OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) <br />countries, two general groupings can be distinguished: those with a strong geographical <br />concentration of urban decline, showing consistent disparities between these areas and <br />the rest of the city (e.g. France, Ireland, the UK and the USA); and those who may have <br />areas of high relative unemployment and low relative income but where these <br />characteristics do not appear to be linked as closely to other signs of multiple deprivation <br />as they are in the first group (e.g. Canada, Finland, Spain and Sweden) (Kamal-Chaoui <br />2001). <br />In some countries, decline is mainly located in city centres. This is the case of the <br />United States and Canada, where many metropolitan areas have been emptied, with not <br />only residents but also economic activities relocating to suburban areas. In other <br />countries, urban decline develops in peripheral areas, generally associated with large, <br />multi-family social housing units have been built on greenfield sites on the periphery of <br />the city or in neighbouring municipalities as part of a planned expansion to cope with <br />population growth (Carley 1990, Kamal-Chaoui 2001, Randolph and Judd 1999). These <br />areas were also designed to re-house low-income families displaced by inner-city <br />redevelopment projects. As a result, many of these outlying housing estates were poorly <br />served by road links or public transportation and lacked amenities such as day care <br />centres and schools, and community, cultural and leisure facilities. This pattern is typical <br />of France, but similar developments can be found in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, <br />the Nordic countries and major cities in Southern Europe (Kamal-Chaoui 2001). <br />Certain cities combine the two types of models. In some cases, the mix is a <br />deliberate outcome of government policy. <br />2.2. The United States Experience <br />Serious social, economic, and physical problems face the American city. As noted <br />by Koebel (1996, pp.6-7): <br />The shift of population to the suburbs started slowly in the 1950s, accelerated in <br />the1970s, and peaked in the 1980s. The middle class - both white and black - in large <br />measure moved to the suburbs. Sensitive to the location of affluence, retail trade <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.