Laserfiche WebLink
Cc�mprchci��i��c Nci�hb<�urh�x,d StucGc�: C'h,u�.ictcrii.in�� Dcrlinc <br />• Central cities have a wide range of institutions and social amenities that <br />foster more economically diverse, and therefore more stable communities. <br />The inner-ring's inexpensive housing is rarely unique, nor is it often <br />accompanied by entertainment, amenities, or parks. <br />• Cities tend to have a more participatory public culture. Suburbanites are <br />more likely to be individualists, less interested in the neighbourhood social <br />and political issues and are less involved in public concerns. <br />• Central cities are heterogeneous and retain pockets of both stability and <br />gentrification. Middle- and working-class suburbs are homogenous and do <br />not have elite or gentrifying neighbourhoods. <br />■ Much of the housing stock in central cities is durable and offers amenities � <br />such as stone or brick exteriors, hardwood floors, and built-in cabinetry <br />that remain fashionable. Most post-World War II rapidly assembled and ' <br />inexpensively constructed homes are not unique, and are in direct <br />competition with more modern housing in outer-edge cities with less <br />social stress. <br />A review of the American literature clearly indicates that neighbourhood decline <br />has been a prominent part of the process of urban development and evolution over the <br />past three to four decades. Decline has a decidedly inner city focus, but several studies <br />suggest that the process of decline can occur on a much broader geographical basis. <br />There is growing evidence to suggest the older suburban neighbourhoods (developed <br />before or immediately after World War II) are beginning to show characteristics typical <br />of decline. <br />Core studies from the literature also illustrate that although the characteristics, <br />nature, and extent of decline vary from one city to the next, there are many <br />commonalties. These commonalties manifest themselves in the nature of housing and <br />commercial infrastructure, the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the <br />population, the lack of investment in core areas, the presence of various social <br />pathologies and the attitudes and opinions of residents within these areas and people <br />fleeing these neighbourhoods or living in other parts of the city. Neighbourhood decline <br />in American cities is also highly correlated with certain ethnic and racial groups. At times <br />the depth of decline and level of despair in these neighbourhoods is overwhelming. <br />2.3. The European Experience <br />A pattern of decentralisation can be seen in all Western European cities after <br />World War II. According to a recent survey of European city officials, settlement patterns <br />are becoming more complex and the continuing suburbanisation of population and jobs is <br />one of the major features (OECD 1995, p. 15). Richardson and Gordon state (1999) that <br />in many European cities (for instance, Antwerp, Copenhagen, Hamburg, Milan, Paris and <br />Rotterdam) both population and employment grew faster in the suburbs than in the core <br />city, even in the 1970s. More recent data show declines in central city population shares: <br />Paris, 32-23 per cent, 1968-90; Zurich, 38-29 per cent, 1970-95; Amsterdam, 80-66 per <br />cent, 1970-94; less so in London, 41-38 per cent, 1971-94 (ibid.). <br />�-. .�. <br />�i <br />