My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-014
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 2:25:27 PM
Creation date
6/19/2013 3:43:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-014
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprchcnsi��c N�i��hbourh�,c��i Stu�iic�: ('ha�.icicrii_inz Dcrlinc <br />2. Rehabilitation Areas: areas where decline is having a spill-over effect to <br />the extent that it is beginning to impact the overall stability of the <br />neighbourhood. <br />3. Conservation Areas: neighbourhoods, which are physically and socially <br />stable but are showing initial signs of decline. <br />4. Emerging Areas: areas in which new development is being considered. <br />5. Housing Improvement Zones: areas that fall under the Major Improvement <br />Area or Rehabilitation Area. <br />In early 2000, the City sought to develop a more comprehensive statistical model <br />to aid in neighbourhood designation and established a working group to determine what <br />indicators would be used to designate areas (City of Winnipeg 2000b). This group <br />consisted of representatives from the Social Planning Council of Winnipeg, the <br />University of Winnipeg's Institute of Urban Studies and the Department of Economics. <br />In addition, representatives from the City of Winnipeg included the Winnipeg Police <br />Service, Corporate Services, Property Assessment, Planning, Property and Development <br />Services, and the Community Services Department. <br />The group identified four indicator categories: Housing, Crime and Safety, <br />Economic Conditions, and Social Health and Well Being. Drawing on information from <br />the Community Indicators Handbook, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the <br />Quality of Life Indicators for the City of Winnipeg, the 1978 Winnipeg Characterisation <br />Study, the 1998 Minnesota Milestones, and Planning for Social Equity in Winnipeg, the <br />group identifies 30 potential indicators. Based on relevance to the Winnipeg Housing <br />Policy, availability of neighbourhood level data, and data sustainability, the group <br />narrowed the list to 15 indicators. These 15 indicators were further divided into two <br />groups: primary indicators, and secondary supporting indicators (Table 9). A statistical <br />methodology was used to measure the conelation of each indicator against the Housing <br />Condition Indicator. Those with the highest correlation became the primary indicators. <br />Table 9. Neighbourhood Designation Indicatots <br />Primary Indicators Supporting Indicators <br />■ Housing Condition ■ Piacarded Dwellings <br />• Percentage of Re�tal Dwellings ■ Maintenance and Occupancy Orders <br />• Crime ■ Demolitions <br />■ L.I.C.O. ■ Rooming Houses <br />• Unemployment ■ Average Household Income Labour Force <br />• Median selling Price PaRicipation Rate <br />■ Average Effective Age of a Dwelling ' Population <br />The seven primary indicators became the basis for the Housing Policy <br />Neighbourhood Designation Index (HPNDI): <br />HPNDI = aM + bH + cL + dR + eA + fC + gU, where <br />� <br />-�. <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.