My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-042
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 12:11:24 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 2:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-042
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� — <br />: o foot vaR�aNCE to Section 1004.01(A)6 of the City Code, subject to the following <br />;� conditions: <br />���� a. The proposed addition shall be consistent in size and location with the site <br />_. plan included with this staff report as Attachment D and be limited to I 1 <br />.. . feet in depth from the existing building wall; <br />b. The applicant shall continue to work with Community Development staff <br />to mask the appearance of the upper level addition on the split-level home <br />;� through utilization of structural materials a well as landscaping; <br />c. The impervious coverage on the property shall not exceed 43.25% of the <br />_�:�+ overall lot area; <br />d. Storm water runoff shall be limited to the level consistent with 30% <br />impervious coverage; depending on the soils and slopes on the property, <br />such reduction could be accomplished by directing rain gutters toward the <br />interior of the lot, installing and maintaining a"rain garden" filtration <br />basin, or some combination of these or other measures as approved by the <br />City Engineer. Building permits shall not be issued until the City Engineer <br />has approved the storm water mitigation plans; and <br />�; e. The variance shall expire 6 months of the approval date if a building <br />permit is not issued, pursuant to § 1013.03 of the City Code. <br />,. � <br />� <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />; <br />and voted against; <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.