pf09-002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-� � �o�� 7.10 The northeast corner of the building is now proposed at a 45-degree angle versus the 2�o previous 90-degree. This modification softens the view and breaks-up the wall expanse �� and lessens the visual impact from properties to the east and northeast. '?�2 7.11 The building now includes various jogs to assist in breaking-up the long expanse for the i1 � north and south sides. �;=� 7.12 The southeast "L" wing of the building now jogs at an angle when it approaches County � � � Road B. This design element will soften the impact of the building and give it added 21� character, privacy, and curb appeaL The third floor now steps back 10 feet further form �� r the property line than the lower floors. At the northwest corner of the buiiding the third 2�� floor steps back a full unit. 2�� 7.13 The angled "L" wing also features a small end capped roofto soften the perceived height 22ti of the structure. The roofline has been lowered and additional design features added to 2�^ give the appearance of a single family structure at the south elevation. G�22 7.14 The setbacks of the building adjacent the north and east property lines have been �2� increased; the north varies from 21 feet to 36.9 feet and the east varies from 30.5 feet to 22G 51.7 feet. z25 7.15 Exterior material would be maintenance-free, likely to include asphalt shingles, 2�� metal/aluminum soffit and fascia, vinyl or concrete (Hardiboard) siding, brick and/or 22� rock-face block. zza 7.16 Setbacks: The Orchard has a minimum 10 foot front yard setback from Midland Grove 22y Road, a varying corner side yard setback adjacent to County Road B of 28.4 to 39.8 feet, 23o a varying side yard setback from the north property line of 21 to 36.9 feet (the proposed ?3^ structure would lie approximately 180 feet from the Midland Grove Condominium �:s�� building), and a varying rear yard setback from the east property line of 30.5 to 51.7 feet. 2:j� Decks and patios would encroach 6 feet closer to the north and east property lines. The �:�% Roseville City Code (R-3 District) requires a 30-foot front-yard setback (west), a 30-foot 2�� corner side yard setback (south), a 10-foot interior side yard setback (north), and a 30- �sc foot rear-yard setback (east). As shown on the Site Plan, the Orchard meets most of these 237 setback requirements. The DRC has discussed the possibility of vacating a portion of the 23a underutilized right-of-way for Midland Grove Road, which, if vacated, could increase the 2�:� official front yard setback, but would not change its proximity to the road. 24u 7.17 Access/Traffic: The applicant proposes to access the site and building via Midland Grove 2�' Road (a public road). Trip Generation engineering data (Institute of Transportation 2�: � Engineers' Trip Generation Report, 8th Edition (2008)) provided by the applicant's t�'� consultant indicates that a 55-unit senior development could generate approximately 193 z�� trips/day overall or approximately 3.5 trips/day per household. Assuming the same trip 24� generation from the Midland Grove Condominium, the existing 174 units would create 2�t7 609 trips per day or a total of 802 trips per day for the two developments. 2�, 7.18 Parkin�: Section 1019.10(A) of the City Code sets minimum parking standards by use. 2�g This section does not specifically identify a parking requirement for assisted-living units 2�Fy as a use and, per to Section 1019.10(B), "where land uses are proposed that are not �5u specifically listed above [within 1019.10(A)], the City Council shall establish a 2:>? reasonable number of off-street parking space for such use." The City Code has ��-::? established parking requirements for nursing homes and senior housing at one space per 2.>� four beds and one enclosed space plus 0.3 spaces of visitor parking, respectively. The �� Planning Division has determined that on-site parking shall be 55 enclosed and 16 PF09-002 RCA 051109.doc Page6of8