My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-002
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:46:44 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 2:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-002
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />_ <br />Attachment G <br />;��� <br />'Ihv (Jn'hanl <br />Neighbarhood Open House; February 19, 2009 @ 6:00-7:OOpm <br />The Skating Center; Fireside Room <br />The Orchard Senior Active Living Development <br />Open House / Meeti+re No�es (2-19-091: <br />Representatives from Station 19 Archilects (Tim Johnson and Richard Brownlee) and Art <br />Mueller werc present. The approximate attendance was 20 neighbors from the Midland <br />Grove and the Perriswood neighborhoods. <br />Staff from Station 19 Architects and M Mueller were available and answcred questions <br />regarding the revised project, but initially focused on letting people know the basics of <br />the revised proposal. The 4'� Floor has been eliminated to allow 3-stories; �he unit count <br />has been reduced from 77 to 55 units, and the building ends on the south and west sides <br />have shifted in to meet the required multi-family setbacks. <br />Easel boards were used to show site plans, elevations, aeria] representations; and <br />residents were engaged as they entered the room. The open house dialogue was very <br />civil and respectful. informal discussion focuscd on various aspcets of thc project, and <br />ranged from tra�c impacts, revised unit count, height reduc�ion, deusity and revised <br />building setbacks. <br />Informal discussion with various neighbors indicated concerns about: <br />-Treating the east side of the building with special features to mitigate visual impacts <br />-Colors and materials <br />-Blending in more with adjacent residential <br />-Request for additional signage to reduce speeds <br />-Tra�c inerease along Midland Grove Rd <br />-Request for landscaping to increase screening on NE and East sides <br />-1'ransplant evergreens <br />-Discussion about keeping 2"' drive on Midland Grove Road <br />-Discussion about access to site from County Rd B <br />-Fire/Safety aspects of building; clearance on north side of bld� <br />-Balcony usage <br />Neighbor Steve Enzler and another adjacent neighbor remain concerned about the impact <br />to their properties. Enzler focused on what the development will look like from his <br />kitchen pantry, which faces toward the wesL The I-story height reduction and the 97- <br />foot distance were discussed and whether or not this mitigated his concems about <br />sunlight, building mass, etc. <br />Discussion about traffic impacts were discussed by several par[ies, and the Architects <br />conveyed [hat the additional development would generate I cat every 4-5 minutes during <br />peak usage. Some residents sull indicated their concern for traffic and high speeds at the <br />intersections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.