pf09-002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.— —. ��u� the Orchard was not significantly out of line with the Midland Grove �� development, nor did its height pose a great impact to Midland Grove or ��2 Ferriswood Townhomes. He added that the applicant has made great strides in :;.: $� the building's design elements and structure, with improvements to the aesthetics ��= and a reduction in the scale and mass of the project and stated his decision- :>:�:� making perspective is one of the greater Roseville Community. He continued by ti��n stating that the General Concept Plan was good and provided a positive influence u�� on the area and Roseville society, whether or not it increased the City's tax base. �y: Vice Chair Boerigter added the past development projects by Mr. Mueller and the 5�� financing of the project were "red herrings" not germane to the land use approval. son 10.3 On March 4, 2009, the Roseville Planning Commission voted 4-3 to support the ,�' Comprehensive Land Use Amendment. However, under Section 201.07 of the City c�2 Code, this is not a recommendation in the affirmative. The Code requires a 5/7 vote of .; ;�- the Commission to actually qualify as a recommendation. In the absence of such a �:,��? recommendation the Council is not prevented from acting on the request. �;05 10.4 On March 4, 2009, the Planning Commission also voted 7-0 to rezone the property from �<;r.: Single Family Residence to Planned Unit Development. 6;�T 10.5 On June 3, 2009 the Roseville Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval c�� of the General Concept PUD as presented in the project report dated June 3, 2009, �oQ subject to the following conditions: �� a. The applicant/architect shall work with staff on the exterior elevation of the ., , proposed building; ��1 b. Parking shall meet the standard requirement of the City Code; :;�:3 c. The final landscape plan shall include additional screening along the east, south o� ;. and north sides of the building. This screening may include a decorative fence �:;�a and/or berm as well as landscaping; r��o d. The final grading and drainage plan shall meet the requirements of the Rice ��% Creek Watershed and the City of Roseville; �� e. The Roseville Fire Marshall shall approve all fire hydrant locations; ��a f. The final site plan shall be modified to include a sidewalk along the east side of czo Midland Grove Road from County Road B to the Southern property line of �zi Midland Grove Condominiums; :�2rr g. The final site plan shall also be modified to include a sidewalk within the County c�s B right-of-way from Midland Grove Road to Cleveland Avenue; 5z� h. The building be LEED certified or equivalent (the Planning Division does not u2� recommend that any project be required to be LEED certified due to the f2� tremendous cost and time necessary. However we do support and recommend 52 % that projects be encouraged to follow LEED principles and implement "green " �22 technologies). r�t, 11.0 SUGGESTED CITY COiTNCIL ACTION: ::��r The Planning Division recommends that the Roseville City Council take the PF09-002 RCA 071309.doc Page 16 of 17