My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-002
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:46:44 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 2:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-002
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />Sorry this is so late but I've been out ... <br />� <br />�.. <br />� <br />I'd like answers to the following: <br />1. Re the chart on p 11 and the list of projects on p 10 - can you look at the files and verify <br />whether the council was specifically <br />informed that it was waiving density, impervious coverage, and <br />minimum lot sizes. I don't mean "they must have cuz they did it" I mean were they <br />specifically told they were taking those actions? <br />2. Was Art Mueller the developer involved in the project described in 7.1? <br />3. How is it that the policy inconsistency noted in 8.3 has existed for years and Planning <br />hasn't ever suggested it be changed? Or has it? <br />4. Is it possible to make any change contingent on the development actually being built - <br />to avoid changing the zoning and then seeing some whole different project go forward. <br />Please come with language prepared to this effect. <br />Thanks. <br />Tammy L. Pust <br />Parker Rosen LLC <br />612.7G7.3000 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.