My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-002
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:46:44 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 2:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-002
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
... <br />� <br />Thomas Paschke <br />From: Thomas Paschke <br />Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:42 PM <br />To: Tammy Pust <br />Cc: Pat Trudgeon; Bill Malinen <br />Subject: RE: Orchard project <br />Council Member Pust; <br />I have reviewed the Orchard report, the City Code, our files, and attempted as best as <br />possible to recall my (other staf� presentations to past Council's regarding the previous <br />multiple family projects in order to answer the questions you have asked. Below are my <br />responses to your questions: <br />Your first question is very difficult to answer. The nature of a planned unit development is <br />to not follow general or standard Code requirements. The Planning Division has always <br />utilized the PUD process for those unique projects that deviate from a number of general <br />or standard requirements, in order to achieve the goals, objectives and policies of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and Imagine Roseville 2025. I do know that the Planning Staff over <br />the 10 years as City Planner, has made a point of noting some or most of these differences <br />or deviations, but in specific text, charts or graphs. Part of this reason has to do with that <br />fact that if one is proposing a PUD, then there will be several differences/deviations from <br />any number of base zoning designations. However, a PUD is a separate zone that perhaps <br />should not be judged against a specific zone because the Planning Division would need to <br />analyze a specific multiple family project against upwards of three zones' requirements. <br />Also, as it related to a portion of question one, the City Code only has two zoning districts <br />where impervious coverage applies R-1 and R-2. So no Council has ever waived or <br />deviated from impervious coverage requirements for any of the developments analyzed in <br />Section 9.7 as there is no maximum impervious coverage requirement in multi-family <br />zones. <br />Each of the projects identified in the project report included a statement similar to the <br />following: <br />"The GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT is a process by <br />which a development/redevelopment proposal is formally presented in a public hearing to <br />the Planning Commission for consideration. A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br />(PUD) is a zoning district, which may include a single or mix of uses on one or more lots <br />or parcels, and is intended to be used in unique situations to create a more flexible, <br />creative, and efficient approach to the use of the land." The Planning Staff typically has <br />provided some context to what that means for the particular project before the <br />Commission or Council. <br />The following is the information provided in the project reports for the projects <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.