pf09-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.� -� --, Conditional Usc Pcrmit Considerations The Roseville Code criteria for issuing of a co�tditional use permit are fowid at 1013.13ll. Criterion 1. Impact on Traffic. Certainly die movement of nearly 700 heavy commercial vel�icles (trucks), many loaded with hot mi� asphalt, would have an adverse impact on local traffic. 7'he EAW in its trafiic analysis focused on the freeway system and gave only cursor} attention to the local street system. Local traffic faces Iow leve�ls of setvice on several of the Yi'eeway ramps under current conditions. These would be worsened by the addition of several hundred [rucks. Criterion 2. Impact on Parks, streets and other public facilities This proposed asphalt plant would (�ave a substantial adverse effect on the Gross Golf Course, located directly west of the proposed plant. The Golf Course is not located in Roseville, and perhaps the City Council may not consider effecis outside the city. Ho��ever, the operation of die proposed plaz�t would have a very adverse visual effect on the Golf Course, as wel] as from other aspects of the plant operation, e.g. noise, dust, odors, etc. � ln addition, as alluded to above, tlie ability of lhe local street system to safely accommodate die operation of severa] hundred additional ]arge trucks is problematic. Criterion 4. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties. There is research that the prescnce of an asphalt plant adversely affects the market value of contiguous properties. Such research is usually site specific, and would not have a direct correspondence to the plant proposed by Bituininous Roadways. However, tl�is research establishes a sufficient cause that would require a comprehensive market analysis prior to approvinc any Co�ditional Use permit which would allow the proposed plant to be constructed or operated. A comprehensive market analysis �i�ould have to be perYormed wluch ��ould examinc market values of nearby property values �vith and without the proposed asph�lt plant. While I am not an appraiser, I�vould believe that such an analysis would sho�v substantial adverse market value impacts. These in tum woulJ likelv translate into adverse impacts to Roseville and Schoo] District property ta�; receipts. Criterions >. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. Tlze public safetv of residents and otlters would be reduced by the introduction of hundreds of additional Uvck trips in the vicinity. It would be reduced by the possibility uf accidents ��ith tliose trucks, many of whicli would be canying 19 tons of hot asphalt mix at a temperah�re of l�undreds of degrees. The general welfare of tl�e City of Roseville, its residents, businesses a��d visitors would