Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kevin Kain — Bituminous Roadways Roseville Asphait Plant <br />August 11, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />probably be significantly higher because heavy duty trucks have higher noise levels [han cars — a car at <br />10 miles per hour produces 61 dB tompared with 76 d8 for a truck. <br />The EaW did not consider the impacts of 6ackground noise which, In this area, can be significant, <br />especially from Interstate 35W and Highway 36. Walnut Street and Terminal Road which all experience <br />significant trutk trafiit. Ambient background noise from road transportation may range from 45 to 65 <br />d8(A�. Noise levels trom major highways with higher traffit speeds can be significantly higher. <br />Likewise, the EAW does not address the noise impads of increased rail trd�c, which can also be <br />significant. <br />We believe that the EAW needs a more thorougfi noise analysis that considers the actual use of the <br />adjacent properties, the additive effects of all activities in the area of the proposed site, noise impacts <br />from traffic and background noise levels. <br />Fo�lowing a more tomplete noise analysls, the air permit needs to consider mitigative measures to <br />reduce noise pollution, such as limiting the number of crashers and o[her equipment brought in from <br />offsite allowed to operate at [he same time, limiting areas where the equipment can operate, <br />Identifying possible strutturol changes to mitigate nolse potlutlon, and Iimiting times of day when the <br />equipment can opera[e. <br />.... <br />A newspaper report of the July 29th public hearing quotes Bituminous Roadways as indicating ihat the <br />crushers would operate from 6:00 AM through 8:00 PM while the EAW Indicates the crushers wiil �" <br />operate from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Whith is correct� Does the permit tnclude limits for the crusher <br />hours of operatlon? <br />Particulate Matter <br />We are concerned about particulate emissions from [he proposed project. Tbe air Intakes on the roof of <br />our buliding are close to the height of the storage piles and other emissions sources at the proposed <br />asphalt plant site. <br />Distance <br />Distance from <br />from SE �is[ance Nearest <br />Corner from SE Distan[e Alr <br />of Corner from Intake Air <br />Bituminous Roadways property of Bldg Ce�ter to BR Intake <br />�BR) Emission Source (ft) ft of Bldg Elevation Source Elevation <br />Aaphalt rubble pile 300 539 874 988 714 976 <br />RAP pile 372 618 973 993 780 976 <br />Tanks 948 1160 1434 950 1334 976 <br />Asphait millings pile 502 754 1091 994 916 976 <br />1577 WES7BItANCH Uli[VE • SUCCE 2lq • bidEAN, VA P210] • TELEPHONE�70.1Q87�5800 • FAX�703�287•SNO7 <br />www.gladstanecommertial rom I www �.I d__. ��Q�n�/ <br />�. <br />