My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-010
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:32:19 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:41:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-010
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
651
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />Mr. Kevin Kain <br />Mr. Tarik Hanafy <br />September 10, 2010 <br />Page 12 <br />��i�i <br />Moss & Barnett <br />24-hr 8.8 26 34.8 35 99.6% <br />7Mzs Tler 3 <br />Mnual 2.6 10 12.6 15 84.2% <br />1-hr 1033 83 186.3 188 99.196 <br />pp� 7fer 3 <br />Annua! 15.1 17 32.1 100 32.146 <br />1-hr 1,044.5 3,565 4,609.5 ��� 11.5% <br />CO (35,000) (13.2%) Tier 1 <br />8-hr 373.4 2,760 3,133.4 50,000 31.33% <br />Vehfcle trafflc can be a significant source of these four criteria pollutants. Based on our review <br />of the permft materlals we cannot determine whether the modeling consider ex(sting traffic <br />emissions on local streets and Interstate 35W and Trunk Hfghway 36, and emisslons from <br />increased traffic due to tlie proposed project, We request that the proposed facility be <br />remodeled to include emissions from trafflc. <br />^ Nthough we requested the modeling report on August i6, 2010, we did not get the report until <br />September 8, 2010 and have not had tlme to fully evaluate It. If, as we suspect, the modeling <br />did not consider the air Intakes on our roof and on other nearby bulldings as receptors, the <br />modeling must be revised. We are concemed that the concentretions of these pollutants may <br />be higher on the roof of our building and other nearby buildings. It is critical to account for air <br />intakes on the roofs of nearby buildings to detertnine the Impacts of the proposed project on <br />building ocapants. <br />Meteorological Data <br />The modeling uses meteorological data from tlie 1986-1990 perfod, We understand that more <br />recent meteorological data is available. This data should also be reviewed and incorporated in <br />emissions modeiing for the proposed plant. <br />Nuisance Dust <br />For fugitive dust emissions from wind erosion the Bituminous Roadways permit appllcaUon uses <br />a Total Suspended Particulate emissions calculation fw asphalt rooflng from 1983. Gladstone <br />believes that Ute most recent emissions factors should be used espedaily when tonsidering the <br />high particulate concentrations that are revealed in the modeling. <br />The MPCA regulates fine partculate (PM,a) and particulate known to cause resplratory and <br />cardlovascular disease (PMz.$)• The emissions calculations suggest that proposed facility will <br />also create a signiflcanY quantiry of larger par[iculate matter which will settie out of the air a <br />short distance from the proposed facility. These fugitive emissions are a nufsar�ce and Qeate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.