My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-010
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:32:19 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:41:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-010
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
651
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />31 <br />32 S.O STAFF COMMENTS <br />�-. <br />33 Section 1007A15 (Industrial District Uses) of the City Code allows outdoor storage of <br />34 matenals and equipment as a CONDITIONAL USE in an I-2 district, as long as the items <br />35 being stored are concealed by screening of at least 8 feet in height as specified in <br />36 § 1007.03B (Storage). Screening of the southern and eastern sides of the storage areas is <br />37 not shown on the proposed site plan (included with this staff report as Attachment D), but <br />38 because the screening is required by the City Code there is no need to add a specific <br />39 condition to an approval of the CONDITIONAL USE request. <br />40 Section 407.02M (Unlawful Parking) of the City Code further requires all vehicles, which <br />41 includes trucks and heavy equipment, to be parked on paved surfaces. As with the <br />42 screening requirements noted above, Planning Division staff recommends relying on <br />43 existing regulations in the City Code rather than attaching additional conditions to an <br />44 approval of the proposed CoNDITtoNAL USE. <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />68 <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />As illustrated the proposed site plan, the stockpiles of aggregate materials would be <br />distributed throughout much of the site; because of this and the large size of the proposed <br />stockpiles, Planning Division staff believes that it would be appropriate to treat them like <br />buildings for setback purposes. Specifically, the piles of aggregate materials should be set <br />back a minimum of 40 feet from property lines adjacent to public streets and a minimum <br />of 20 feet from a rear or side property line (which coincides with the railroad right-of-way <br />in this case). The proposed site plan is consistent with these recommended setbacks. <br />Asphalt is 100% recyclable, and because asphalt production and road construction relies <br />heavily on recycled materials, the proposed stockpiles would be comprise asphalt <br />millings, asphalt rubble, and concrete rubble reclaimed from pavement that is being <br />replaced elsewhere as well as raw aggregates and discarded roofing shingles. <br />Bituminous Roadways' proposal to stockpile reclaimed rubble asphalt and rubble cement <br />for recycling into new asphalt would involve periodic crushing of the reclaimed asphalt <br />and cement. Similar recycling operations have been approved in the past as interim uses, <br />but in those instances the crushing was not integral to the principal, permitted use on the <br />site as it would be in this case. Since the reclaimed materials subject to the proposed <br />crushing are to be stored outdoors, they are necessarily part of the proposed CoNDIT�oNAL <br />UsE; therefore the crushing itself can also be reviewed against the conditional use criteria. <br />6.O REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA <br />Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning Commission <br />and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a coND�TlotvAL UsE <br />application: <br />a. lmpact on traffic; <br />b. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and <br />structures with contiguous properties; <br />d. <br />e. <br />Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and <br />090615 RCA Bituminous Roadway CU <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.