pf09-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-� � Joseph Malernowski, Moss and Barnet, representing UCO6 Roseville M?J LLC, property owner of 2501 Walnut Street, Roseville, pg. 6-8). H. The proposed asphalt plant proposal wi11 emit toxic and noxious materials in a manner that will conslitute a nuisance to t6e surrounding area prohibited under 1007.01(D)(3) ofthe Roseville City Code. Specifically, incomplete combustion and asphalt paving generate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) a significant concern for storm water ponds. (Source: Letter from Neighbors Against the Asphalt Plant-Strategies Committee dated September 9, 2010, Pg. 8). I. The proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit toxic and noxious materials in a manner that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding area prohibited under 1007.01(D)(3) of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, the emissions of the materials generated by the production of asphalt will affect up to 94 people who have asthma or other chronic respiratory illnesses. (Source: Letter from Megan Dushin dated September 10, 2010, pg. 2). J. The proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit odors in a manner that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding azea prohibited under 1007.01(D)(4) of the Roseville City Code. Specirically, the City has heard repeated testimony and been procided written correspondence indicating that smells from the industrial area north of Hwy. 36 are detected in the residential azea south of Highway 36 (5ource: Comments submitted to PCA in response to Draft EAW ). K. The proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit odors in a manner that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding area prohibited under 1007.01(D)(4) of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, it has been modeled that the quantity of HzS [Ffydrogen Sulfide], will be at a quantity that is detec[able by surrounding properties, specifically 2501 Walnut Streel, a commercial office building as well as the Gross Golf Course, and the residential area south of Hwy. 36. (Source: Letter dated August 1 l, 2010 from Chris Massey, Vice President, UC06 Roseville MN LI,C, property owner of 2501 Walnut Street, Roseville; pgs. 7-8). I.. "I he proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit odors in a manner that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding area prohibited under ] 007.01(D)(4) of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, the presence in air of unidentified odorous compounds responsible for the perception of the "asphalt odor" will lead to contamination of food products manufactured by Old Dutch Foods. (Sources: Repori from Pedro A. Rodriguez, Ph. D dated October 15, 2010 and