Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pratt advised that while single stream collection suggested carts, it did not <br /> require them, and bins would be considered. <br /> Regarding end market verification, Mr. Pratt advised that a vendor would be <br /> required to provide that information as part of this RFP process; and could require <br /> tonnages being delivered to each end market vendor and examples of those end <br /> products made by that specific end market manufacturer for verification. <br /> Vice Chair Stenlund suggested including market indicator/demand as part of <br /> Section 4.22 or 4.32; but Mr. Pratt noted that those sections were definitions and <br /> wouldn't be an appropriate place for that added language. However, Mr. Pratt <br /> advised that staff would find an appropriate place to add the language to <br /> guarantee that a real product was available at the end market. <br /> Vice Chair Stenlund opined that, considering carts versus bins and if for single <br /> stream, bi-weekly collection, carts would be better for stability and human safety, <br /> based on the potential weight of materials being brought curbside. <br /> Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Pratt concurred, noting that there was a proven decrease in <br /> workers compensation claims for vendors switching from bins to carts; with Vice <br /> Chair Stenlund recognizing that as a significant cost savings for vendors and <br /> ultimate the City in the cost of the program. <br /> 7. Josephine Heights Subdivision Preliminary Plans <br /> Mr. Schwartz briefly presented this fairly new Preliminary Plan submittal for the <br /> Josephine Heights Subdivision, west of Victoria and Millwood Avenues; and <br /> referenced the attachments to the staff report for PWETC review and comment. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that staff had requested the developer provide two (2) <br /> Outlots versus easements for infrastructure, including stormwater management. <br /> Discussion and review including long-term maintenance of landscaping addressed <br /> through a maintenance contract developed by the City Attorney with the <br /> developer/homeowner's association maintaining the landscaping and the City <br /> maintaining stormwater management areas; and including assignment for any <br /> future landscaping reconstruction costs as part of that agreement. Mr. Schwartz <br /> noted that the City needed to be cognizant of that concern when approving a <br /> landscaping plan. <br /> Further discussion included reconstruction neighborhood concerns regarding <br /> screening of headlights from the new development for existing homes and <br /> changes to the character of the neighborhood with the change from this long-term <br /> wooded lot to new homes; and maintenance of the cul-de-sac by the City as a <br /> public street; lot configuration and size. <br /> Vice Chair Stenlund stated, for the record, that he felt it was important for <br /> Roseville staff to see a written maintenance plan in place including where future <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br />