My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03715
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 11:18:56 AM
Creation date
7/2/2013 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3715
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the 24t�, <br />of April, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE 60-DAY REVIEW PERIOD <br />FOR AN FOR A REZONING AND A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY CENT <br />VENTURES, INGLIVINGSTON-COGNOSCENTE-EXTRA LEASE, RELATED TO <br />REDEVELOPIVIENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2700 CLEVELAND AVENUE (PF <br />3715) <br />WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Cent Ventures, Inc-Livingston- <br />Cognoscente-Extra Lease (the Developers) for a rezoning and a Planned Unit Development related to <br />redevelopment of property located at 2700 Cleveland Avenue; and <br />WHEREAS, the application was submitted to the Community Development Department on <br />March 20, 2006; determined incomplete on March 30, 2006; forwarded to applicant on March 30, 2006; <br />and has a 60 day revie�v deadline of May 18, 2006; and <br />WHEREAS, the application was incomplete and staff communicated that to the Developers on <br />March 30, 2006. Submission of the additional required materials will require the Developer to expend <br />additional time and consultant services and will ultimately mean that the Developer cannot (in the staff <br />opinion) submit the completed application in time for the May 3, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and <br />hearings. Additional time will be needed for city staff and city consultants to review this project; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Planner has coinpleted a general review of the proposed site design and <br />elevation drawings and concluded that the site plans include numerous inadequacies or discrepancies in <br />meeting the minimum requirements of the Roseville City Code such as: <br />1) evaluation of the need for additional or amended EAW or AUAR work <br />2) conceptual review by the Rice Creek Watershed because, ultimately, the watershed regulations <br />will change your site layout or utility layout. <br />3) proposed roadway alignment with Officially Mapped right of way — if not an integral part of <br />the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC Master Plan (it is unclear in your application (pg 4) line 15) if you <br />are relying on the dimensions and master plan of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC proposal, or <br />creating another a new nlaster plan and PUD as per City Code Secion 1008.10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.