pf_03715 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Community Development Department 651-792-7074 ♦ fax: 651-792-7070 In your submittal you state that the proposal does not include a subdivision plat. However, it is unclear how you plan to address Twin Lakes Parkway, specifically the Officially Mapped right- of-way (if you are not part of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC Master Plan). Lastly, I have conducted a general review of the proposed site design and elevation drawings and concluded that your site plans include numerous inadequacies or discrepancies in meeting the minimum requirements of the City Code such as: 1) evaluation of the need for additional or amended EAW or AUAR work 2) conceptual review by the Rice Creek Watershed because, ultimately, the watershed regulations will change your site layout or utility layout. 3) proposed roadway alignment with Officially Mapped right of way — if not an integral part of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC Master Plan (it is unclear in your application (pg 4) line 15) if you are relying on the dimensions and master plan of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC proposal, or creating another a new master plan and PUD as per City Code Secion1008.10. 4) review of parking, joint and remote parking agreements you have proposed, and some written indication that adjoining owners will share parking. 5) traffic analysis of turning movements and traffic generation at peak periods — the city may wish to have your numbers reviewed by the city's traffic consultant SRF, the cost of which is borne by the developer. Pg 8, line 2 of your application states the Parkway could accommodate 73,000 trips. This has to be a typo or misconstruction of SRF's numbers. 6) detail on an entry canopy signage, and access roads within required setbacks. 7) consistency of landscape materials and placement with city street tree master plan 8) indication of financial plans the development will have to assist in the construction of new public roads, sidewalks, pathways, landscaping, joint surface\storm water facilities water, and park facilities. In summary, I have determined that your Planned Unit Development and Rezoning applications are incomplete under State Statute 15.99 and cannot be processed as submitted. Since one of the items necessary for the City to accept your request is for you to complete a Master Plan of a designated area, we believe that this process would, if undertaken, take some time and therefore �