My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3708
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,� 1 Attachment A <br />2 Proposed Housing Maintenance Code <br />3 November 28, 2005 <br />4 7:00 p.m. <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />� 20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />^ 38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />The following is a summary of the public he4ring comments and questions with <br />staff responsesinitnlics. <br />1. Would like to see a grid comparing the existing codes with the proposed <br />IPMC. Staff Response - A comparrson of the IPMC, 2003 edition and the <br />existing City Code is provided in Attachment B or Council Report fo� <br />12/19/05 <br />2. Would there still be a benefit to doing the housing maintenance ordinance <br />without the rent4l ordinance? Staff Response - Yes, but inspection staff still <br />believes there is value in a rental licensing ordinance which is currently being <br />revised for further review on Tanuary 30, 2006. The issues of housing <br />maintenance and /ack of a hausing maintenance code to oddress issues has <br />been studies and discussed for the past 10 yea�s for all properties. <br />3. Housing maintenance code is very much needed - existing codes are outdated. <br />Staff Response - Yes, however the rentalissues willstill�emain. The I.P.M.C. <br />simply better defines what is meant by inaintenonce'and specifically <br />oddresses critical mointenance issues Fa� example, a new car comes with o <br />small manual that specifies �equi�ed maintenance. Mechanics use a much <br />bigger/thicker maintenance manual. Their manual does not requi�e more <br />mointenance; it just bette�- explains and descrrbes required maintenance. <br />Same wrth the I PM.C„ it better describes what is meant by maintenonce. <br />With housing stock up to 50 yea�s old, this is becoming a mo�e significont and <br />necessary issue with each passing yeor. Unless the overall housing stock is <br />maintained p�operty values willnot keep up with sur�ounding cities and/or <br />inf/ation, property owners will loose appreciation volue, and property tax <br />receipts will lag. <br />4. Isn't existing property - both rental and ownership - covered under existing <br />state laws and Roseville codes? Staff Respanse - Yes, butstate law tends to <br />be verygenerolin scope and does not provide adequateguidance ta the <br />prope�ty owners and inspectors. Roseville has not adopted a specific housing <br />maintenance ordinance, nor has a specific rental licensing ordinance been <br />adopted. Some of the items ore be covered under existing codes but they <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.