My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 10:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3708
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br />Cathy Bennett <br />From: Neal Beets Sent: Tue 1/17/2006 11:05 AM <br />To: Cathy Bennett <br />Cc: Dennis Weisch <br />Subject: FW: Proposed rental housing ordinance <br />Attachments: <br />Per your request. This is the only e-mail I have received so far about <br />the rental licensing ordinance. <br />Neal <br />Neal Beets <br />Office�651-792-7021 <br />Mobile: 651-775-3556 <br />Fax:651-792-7020 <br />-----OriginaE Message----- <br />From: Ronis/Hopstock(HSI _ ____ � <br />Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 1:41 PM <br />To: *RVCouncil; Neal Beets <br />Subject: Proposed rental housing ordinance <br />Dear �oseville City Council members & Mr. Beeks, <br />I look�d over the proposed draft rental housing ordinance (revised <br />1/10/06) <br />and fo�!nd some serious problems and inconsistencies with it. I have a <br />sugge�!:on for improving i . <br />The definition of just what is a rental property subject to this <br />ordinance <br />is vague and inconsistent: <br />(1) If 1 own a four-plex and live in one of the units, then the entire <br />buifd r�! is exempt, under revised Section 907.07. However, if I own and <br />live <br />in a sie^fe family house and rent out a room to an unrelated person, <br />that <br />house �� apparently NOT exempt under Sectian 907.07. Does that make <br />sensc � <br />(2) If r own a second house that qualifies for the homestead credit <br />beca� se <br />my r.�;!!�er Eives there, that house is exempt, However, if my mother <br />f2C�ll r�5 <br />a pa€-, ' ime caregiver who also lives in the house in exchange for <br />redu�-1 <br />rent, th--�n that house is NOT exempt. Simllarly, if my mother is living <br />with <br />her =.^cond husband (not my father), who contributes to household <br />expenses, <br />ther �:�,-!er Sedion 907.67 that house is NOT exempt. That does not seem <br />1 . T —__ _ �� <br />r -------, �-.� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.