Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 STAFF COMMENT <br />3.1 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent ofthe ordinance. <br />3.2 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br />3.3 Conditions may be attached to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adjoining <br />properties. <br />3.4 The Sladky home was constructed in 1930 as a cabin and includes a detached garage. <br />The home is built on a flat portion of the lot with a rising elevation to the northeast that is <br />mostly held in place by a retaining wall. The lot also slops gently to the lake. The house <br />has been remodeled into a four-season home. Access to the property extends south along <br />a private drive from North McCarrons Boulevard. Sewer and Water serve the house. <br />3.5 The Sladky request has been forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) <br />for review and comment. Staff was able to review the request with Mr. Joe Richter of the <br />DNR where the following items were discussed: Mr. Richter indicated the DNR would <br />not oppose the replacement in the exact location. However, he indicated a desire to have <br />the four-season porch reduced (would require smaller size) to lessen the impact of the <br />shoreland setback or the option of reconstruction the porch on the east side of the home. <br />The DNR would like the Sladky's to look into these options, but should they not be <br />appropriate given existing conditions, the DNR would support the variance and porch <br />replacement. <br />3.6 The pazcel is odd shaped, has topographical limitations to the northeast and east, is <br />restricted due to a city sewer line and 20 foot wide easement, and has no reasonable <br />alternative. The former four-season porch and its current foundation aze pre-existing <br />non-conforming uses. <br />PF3266 — RPCA (l O1100) Page 2 of 4 <br />