pf_03722 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

vlinnesota Rule 4410.3610 selected under subpart 2 using the standard content and format providect by the EQB under subpart 4. The draft document must be distributed and noticed in accordance with part 4410.1500. B. Reviewers sha11 have 30 days from the date of notice of availability of the draft environmental analysis in the EQB Monitor to submit written comments to the RGU. Reviewers that are governmental units shall be granted a 15-day extension by the RGU upon a written request for good cause. A copy of the request must be sent to the EQB. Comments must address the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in the draft analysis, potential impacts that warrant further analysis, further information that may be required in order to secure permits for specific projects in the future, and mitigation measures or procedures necessary to prevent significant environmental impacts within the area when actual development occurs. Governmental units shall also state in their comments whether or not they wish to be notified by the RG� upon receipt of applications for specific development projects within the area. C. The RGU sha11 revise the environmental analysis document based on comments received during the comment period. The RGU shall include in the document a section specifically responding to each timely, substantive comment received that indicates in what way the comment has been addressed. If the RGU believes a request for additional analysis is unreasonable, it may consult with the EQB chair before responding to the comment . The RGU shall include in the document a plan for mitigation specifying the mitigation measures that wi11 be imposed upon future development within the area in order to avoid or mitigate potential environmental impacts. The plan shall contain a description of how each mitigation measure will be implemented, including a description of the involvement of other agencies, if appropriate. D. The RGU shall distribute the revised environmental analysis document in the same manner as the draft document and also to any persons who commented on the draft document and to the EQB staff. State agencies and the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities have ten days from the date of receipt of the revised document to file an objection to the document with the RGU. A copy of any letter of objection must be filed with the EQB staff. An objection may be filed only if the agency filing the objection has evidence that the revised document contains inaccurate or incomplete information relevant to the ;�dentification and mitigation of potentially significant er.vironmental impacts or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent potentially significant environmental impacts from occurring. E. Unless an objection is filed in accordance with item D, the RGU shall adopt the revised environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation at its first regularly scheduled meeting held 15 or more days after the distribution of the revised document. The RGU shall submit evidence of the adoption of the document and plan for mitigation to the EQB staff and all agencies that have stated that they wish to be Page 3 of 6 lttp://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/4410/3610.html 04/10/2006