Laserfiche WebLink
vlinnesota Rule 4410.3610 <br />informed of any future projects within the area as part of their <br />comments on the draft environmental analysis document. The EQB <br />shall publish a notice of the adoption of the documents and the <br />completion of the review process in the EQB Monitor. <br />Upon adoption of the environmental analysis document and <br />the plan for mitigation, residential, commercial, warehousing, <br />and light industrial projects and associated infrastructure <br />within the area that are consistent with the assumptions of the <br />document and that comply with the plan for mitigation are exempt <br />from review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2.100 to <br />441U.2800. <br />F. If an objection is filed with the RGU in <br />accordance with item D, within five days of receipt of the <br />objection the RGU shall consult with the objecting agency about <br />the issues raised in the objection and shall advise the EQB <br />staff of its proposed response to the objection. At the request <br />of the RGU, the objecting agency, the EQB staff, and any other <br />affected agency shall meet with the RGU as soon as practicable <br />to attempt to resolve the issues raised in the objection. <br />Within 30 days after receipt of the objection the RGU shall <br />submit a written response to the objecting agency and the EQB <br />chair. The response shall address each of the issues raised in <br />the objection. The RGU may address an issue by either revising <br />the environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation, or <br />by explaining why it believes that the issue is not relevant to <br />the identification and mitigation of potentially significant <br />environmental impacts. <br />G. Within five days of receipt of the RGU's response <br />to the objection, the objecting agency shall advise the EQB <br />chair of whether it accepts the response and withdraws its <br />objection or continues to object. If the objecting agency <br />continues to object, the EQB chair shall place the matter on the <br />agenda of the next regularly scheduled EQB meeting or of a <br />special meeting. <br />H. If the matter is referred to the EQB under item G, <br />the EQB shall determine whether the environmental analysis <br />document and plan for mitigation are adequate, conditionally <br />adequate, or inadequate. If the EQB finds the documents <br />conditionally adequate or inadequate, the EQB shall specify the <br />revisions necessary for adequacy. The EQB shall only find the <br />documents inadequate if it determines that they contain <br />inaccurate or incomplete information necessary to the <br />identification and mitigation of potentially significant <br />environmental impacts or that the proposed plan for mitigation <br />will be inadequate to prevent the occurrence of potentially <br />significant environmental impacts. <br />If the EQB finds the documents adequate or conditionally <br />adequate, the RGU shall adopt the documents under item E. If <br />the documents were found conditionally adequate by the EQB, the <br />RGU shall first revise the documents as directed by the EQB. If <br />the EQB finds the documents inadequate, the RGU has 30 days to <br />revise the documents and circulate them for review in accordance <br />with items D to H. <br />Subp. 6. Time limit. Unless an objection is filed under <br />subpart S, item D, the RGU shall adopt the environmental <br />analysis document and plan for mitigation no later than at its <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />ittp://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/4410/3610.htm1 04/10/2006 <br />