Laserfiche WebLink
vlinnesota Rule 4410.3610 <br />first meeting held more than 120 days after the date on which <br />the RGU ordered review under this part. The time limit may be <br />extended upon the agreement of all proposers whose project <br />schedules are affected by the review. <br />Subp. 7. Updating the review. To remain valid as a <br />substitute form of review, the environmental analysis document <br />and the plan for mitigation must be revised if any of the <br />circumstances in items A to H apply. <br />A. Five years have passed since the RGU adopted the <br />original environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation <br />or the latest revision. This item does not apply if all <br />development within the area has been given final approval by the <br />RGJ. <br />B. A comprehensive plan amendment is proposed that <br />would allow an increase in development over the levels assumed <br />in the environmental analysis document. <br />C. Total development within the area would exceed the <br />maximum levels assumed in the environmental analysis document. <br />D. Development within any subarea delineated in the <br />environmental analysis document would exceed the maximum levels <br />assumed for that subarea in the document. <br />E. A substantial change is proposed in public <br />racilities intended to service development in the area that may <br />result in increased adverse impacts on the environment. <br />F. Development or construction of public facilities <br />wiil occur on a schedule other than that assumed in the <br />environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation so as to <br />substantially increase the likelihood or magnitude of potential <br />adverse environmental impacts or to substantially postpone the <br />implementation of identified mitigation measures. <br />G. New information demonstrates that important <br />assumptions or background conditions used in the analysis <br />presented in the environmental analysis document are <br />substantially in error and that environmental impacts have <br />consequently been substantially underestimated. <br />H. The RGU determines that other substantial changes <br />have occurred that may affect the potential for, or magnitude <br />of, adverse environmental impacts. <br />The environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation <br />must be revised by preparing, distributing, and reviewing <br />revised documents in accordance with subpart 5, items D to H, <br />except that the documents must be distributed to all persons on <br />the EAW distribution list under part 4410.1500. Persons not <br />enti�led to object to the documents under subpart 5, item D, may <br />submit comments to the RGU suggesting changes in the documents. <br />Subp. 8. Report to EQB. The EQB chair may ask the RGU <br />report on the status of actual development within the area, <br />on the status of implementation of the plan for mitigation. <br />Upon request, the RGU shall report to the EQB chair within <br />ciays . <br />STAT AUTH: MS s"�.16_�.O�i; 116D.045 <br />to <br />and <br />30 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />ittp://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/4410/3610.html 04/10/2006 <br />