Laserfiche WebLink
original Dale Street (now Dale Court). Soils in this area should be analyzed for <br />compaction and water content prior to issuance of building permits. The existing <br />property has a garage and a loop driveway that would be removed with the <br />construction of a new home on Parcel "B". <br />5.2 Parcel "A" could have up to 4650 s.f. of impervious coverage and still meet the <br />maximum lot coverage requirements of 30%. New parcel "B" could have lot <br />coverage up to 3,482 s.f. No house is proposed at this time but a number of <br />alternative designs could adapt to the triangle shaped 1,491 s.f. buildable area of <br />the new lot, which meet all the required setbacks. A tuck-under or split level <br />designed house could reduce the foot print by building two to three stories, leaving <br />1,991 s.f. for driveway and other site improvements — a new driveway on Parcel <br />"A" could range from 600 to 1,000 s.f. The newly created parcel may have a front <br />and rear yard setback of up to 30 feet, a side yard setback of 10 feet. <br />5.3 Other lots/parcels in the neighborhood have been split in recent years. Specifically, <br />in May 1983 the City approved a lot division at 1748 Alta Vista, creating the lot at <br />1747 Dale Street (PF1425) and in July of 1984 the City approved a lot division at <br />1766 Alta Vista, creating the lot at 1765 Dale Street (PF1513). PF636 of 1971 <br />created the four lots at 1800, 1804 and 1808 Alta Vista and 1781 Dale Street, and <br />PF1292 of 1981 created the 6 lots at 1812, 1816, 1820, 1822 Alta Vista and the 2 <br />vacant lots adjacent to Dale Street. It is worth noting that none of the lot divisions <br />received variances from width, depth and/or lot area requirements ofthe Roseville <br />City Code. Pf 3626 (Beauclaire), 1758 Alta Vista, recently (April, 2005) was <br />approved as a minor lot split and a width variance. <br />5.4 City Code Section 11.0404 E states: Three Parcel Minor Subdivision: When a <br />subdivision creates a total of three (3) or less parcels, situated in an area where <br />public utilities and street rights of way to serve the proposed parcels already exist <br />in accordance with City codes, and no further utility or street extensions are <br />necessary, and the new parcels meet or exceed the size requirements of the zoning <br />code, the applicant may apply for a minar subdivision approval. In this case Parcel <br />"A" meets all requirements of the Cit�Code. An 892 sq. ft lot size variance for <br />Parcel "B" is necessary before a decision on the Minor Subdivision can be made. <br />5.5 City Code Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) establishes <br />the minimum lot standards for residential parcels, which includes: an 85 foot <br />minimum width along a public right-of-way; a 110 foot minimum depth; and <br />11,000 s.f. minimum. On a corner lot the width and depth are both 100 feet, the lot <br />area is to be 12,500 s.f. <br />5.6 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... Where there are practical difficulties or <br />unusual hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions <br />of this code, the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and <br />after notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with <br />Rf'CA PF365�(080305) - Page 3 of 6 <br />