My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03798
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 1:10:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2013 11:39:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3798
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 BACKGROUND: <br />4.1 Ms. Maylone owns the property at 699 Belmont Lane, which has a Comprehensive Plan <br />designation of Low-Density Residential (LR) and a zoning classification of Single- <br />Family Residence District (R-1). <br />4.2 The variance request has been prompted by the applicant's desire to expand the principal <br />structure — specifically, the attached garage — toward the front property line so as to <br />increase the amount of enclosed parking/storage and allow for additional living space by <br />converting the existing one-car, tuck-under garage into living area. <br />4.3 In 1984, a minor variance was granted to a nearby property (669 Belmont Lane) to allow <br />the attached garage to extend to within 17 feet of the front property line in order to <br />accomplish a similar goal of increasing the amount of enclosed parking. <br />5.0 STAFF COMMENT: <br />5.1 The lot in question was created in 1955 and has an area of about 10,900 square feet, <br />which is smaller than the Code currently requires for a corner lot. <br />5.2 The grade at the back of the principal structure appears to be approximately 8 feet higher <br />than the grade at the street. This slope, in addition to the location of the structure on the <br />property, and the applicant's desire to convert the existing garage to living area, <br />eliminates expansion of the garage toward the rear or side of the lot as an option for <br />increasing the size of the attached garage. <br />5.3 Pursuant to § 1004.O1E (Pre-existing Setbacks) of the City Code, the required front yard <br />setback on this property is 33 feet. <br />5.4 When no living area exists above an attached garage, the Community Development <br />Department has traditionally allowed such a garage to be built 27 feet from the front <br />property line, which represents a 10% reduction in the required front yard; the full, <br />required front yard setback has, however, been enforced for the residential portion of any <br />principal structure. Because the proposed attached garage does not include living area <br />above, a 29.7-foot front yard setback would be enforced; the proposed 22-foot addition <br />would, therefore, encroach about 18.7 feet into the required setback and would stand <br />approximately 11 feet from the front property line. <br />5.5 The proposed garage addition would be constructed of materials to match the existing <br />home, including a"hipped" roof like that of the main structure. <br />5.6 Section 1013 of the Roseville City Code states: "Where there are practical difficulties <br />or unusual hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of <br />this code, the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after <br />notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony wit6 the general <br />purpose and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it <br />considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be <br />secured and substantial justice done." <br />PF3798_RV BA_ 120606 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.