Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Agenda Section: <br />DATE: 2/26/07 <br />ITEM NO: 10. <br />Depa1 ment Api�/ Jval: City M��r Approval: � Agenda Section: <br />< <br />Item Descn ion: Continuation of the�P�AL of the VARI AN E BOARD'S action to <br />DENY the request by Thomas McDaniel f VARIANCE to §1016 <br />(Wetland Setbacks) of the Roseville City Code to allow a principal structure <br />encroachment into the required setback from a wetland at 527 Owasso Hills <br />Drive (PF3787) <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br />_ 1.1 The variance request by Thomas McDaniel at 527 Owasso Hills Drive was prompted by <br />> the applicant's desire to construct an addition, of approximately 15 feet by 18 feet in size, <br />� that would reduce the setback from the wetland to about 35 feet. <br />c 1.2 City staff recommended that the variance be denied because no undue hardship would be <br />�: imposed on the property owner if the requirements of the Code were strictly applied; <br />demonstrating such hardship is necessary for variance approval. <br />x 1.3 On October 4, 2006 the Roseville Variance Board held the public hearing regarding the <br />�> request. The Variance Board voted unanimously (3-0) to deny the request. <br />� t� 1.4 Section 1014.04C of the City Code states that the City Council acts as the Board of <br />� � Adjustment in variance appeal actions. <br />�? 1.5 On October 23, 2006 the Roseville City Council opened the appeal hearing and continued <br />�_� the item until a future date to allow Mr. McDaniel to generate additional evidence in <br />i-� support of his application. <br />� � PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY <br />i�� • Application submitted: Sept. 6, 2006 <br />i- • Variance Board action: Oct. 4, 2006 <br />i� • Appeal of Variance Board decision received: Oct. 16, 2006 <br />;�> • City Council opened the appeal hearing and approved a 60-day extension at the <br />��� applicant's request: Oct. 23, 2006. Expiration of extension: Jan. 4, 2007 <br />z� • City Council approved a 60-day extension at the applicant's request: Dec. 18, 2006 <br />_'= Expiration of extension: Mar. 5, 2007 <br />?-, • Anticipated City Council action: Feb. 26, 2007 <br />,-� 2.0 STAFF COMMENTS <br />?� 2.1 Community Development staff has no additional comments on the matter. In order to <br />��> remind Council Members of the previous and standing staff recommendation, the RCA <br />2" packet from the October 23, 2006 City Council meeting is included as "Attachment B". <br />PF3 787_RCA_Appeal_022607 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />