Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 SUGGESTED COUNTIL ACTION <br />� 3.1 The City Counci� has two options pertaining to the VARIANCE APPEAL by Mr. <br />� McDaniel: <br />-t a. The Council can uphold the Variance Board's decision of October 4, 2006 to deny the <br />� requested variance, concluding that no hardships are present to warrant granting a <br />c� variance. To act on this decision the City Council could ADOPT a RESOLUTION <br />- DENYING a VARIANCE to Section 1016. 16 (Wetland Setbacks) of the City <br />` Code. This action will require findings of fact denying said request (see Attachment <br />�� B: Draft Concurring Resolution). <br />t ci b. The Council can support the applicant's request, determining that hardships are <br />� � present that warrant granting a variance. To act on this decision the City Council <br />i? could ADOPT a RESOLUTION APPROVING a 15 foot VARIANCE to Section <br />�� 1016. 16 (Wetland Setbacks) of the City Code (see Attachment C: Draft Variance <br />1-t Approval Resolution). <br />Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd (651-792-7073) <br />Attachments: A: New information from Thomas McDaniel <br />B: RCA packet from October 23, 2006 Ciry Council meeting <br />C: Minutes of October 23, 2006 City Council meeting <br />D: Draft Concurring Resolution <br />E: Draft Variance Approval Resolution <br />PF 3 7 8 7_RCA_Appeal_022607 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />