Laserfiche WebLink
r _� <br />October 13, 2006 <br />To: The City of Roseville <br />Attn: Chris Miller, InterimCity Manager <br />2660 Civic Center Dr <br />Roseville. MN 55113 <br />Dear Mr Miller - <br />The intent of this letter is to file an appeal to a Variance Board decision rendered October 4, <br />2006. A variance was requested by Thomas and Julie McDaniel to City Code section 1016 to <br />encroach approximately 15 feet into a required 50 foot wetland setback. <br />The points supporting a variance being granted are strong. These points are outlined below: <br />Original Situation <br />We purchased the lot at 527 Owasso Hills Dr in ] 996. At this time the outlot area behind <br />our home consisted of two distinct ponds and a"wetland" area. The wetland area was <br />partially on our property. We were properly informed that the wetland existed on our <br />property and of the 50 foot setback requirement. <br />Original Wetland Boundary <br />There were two drawings presented to us during the lot selection/home build process which <br />documented the borders of our property and the wetland location on our property. One was <br />the Development Dwg for the entire Owasso Hills area, the other was the formal Certificate <br />of Survey for our specific lot. These two drawings (attached) are consistent in terms of <br />delineating the original wetland boundary in the northwest corner of our property. By these <br />two drawings, the closest wetland boundary would be at least 75 feet from the proposed 15 <br />foot expansion of our home. Roseville City Staff has generated another drawing showing <br />the wetland boundary (Attachment D in the Variance Board document). This version is very <br />inconsistent with the other two documents mentioned and shows a much larger wetland. <br />The timing and method of this drawing being generated is unclear to me, however, it did not <br />surface during lot selection, permitting process, build process or final approval. It also did <br />not surface in 2000 during extensive dialogue and sharing of drawings with City Staff when <br />discussing the storm water expansion issue (see next paragraph). <br />The Transformation <br />We moved into our home in May, 1997. In 1997 — 2000, significant change occurred in the <br />overall outlot area behind our home. With the area being utilized for storm water retention, <br />the storm water entering the area continually exceeded the capacity of the two ponds and <br />flooded the original "wetlands" area. This flooding significantly expanded the area that was <br />under water and killed off all of the original "wetland" vegetation in addition to vegetation <br />and trees beyond the wetland. On our lot alone, over 20 trees were killed due to the <br />expanded storm water flood area, including several large, mature trees. The stortn water <br />flooding and resulting impacts are documented in a September, 2000 letter to Steve Sarkozy, <br />Roseville City Manager at the time. <br />