Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br />Bryan Lloyd <br />From: david [david@bridgenetech.net] <br />Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 3:57 PM <br />To: Bryan Lloyd <br />Subject: RE: setback permit hearing comments <br />Bryan, <br />My apologies for my misunderstanding; when we spoke I thought I just needed the approval of my neighbors and that it was not <br />going to go before the committee. There are other factors why I am requesting the preferred dimensions of 24'X36'. To give you <br />and the committee a better picture of the situation; both my kitchen and front entry require stair cases to access the house; my <br />intention is to build a deck between the house and the garage that extends out past the front of both with one access to both <br />doors with one staircase. As I mentioned in our conversation; I have two sisters that have a condition called 'Ataxia' and they are <br />unfortunate to have to rely on the use of a wheel chair / walker. With the deck designed this way I will be able to place a temporary <br />ramp on the stairs when they visit for access to the house. In addition, because the height of the house doorway is considerably <br />higher than the garage surface a stair case going down into the garage will be required. The current the stair case that exists <br />between the garage and the house has been a safety concern. A 24' wide garage will allow the stair case to exist inside the <br />garage removing the danger of the staircase and still allow ample room to park two cars with room to walk around. This will also <br />allow room for a small ramp to be placed on the deck for access into the house when needed. <br />As far a moving the garage, I would prefer to move it forward in front of the house however I know that the code will not allow that <br />as well. I would like the garage to stay where it is for two reasons; first, because of landscaping plans, moving the garage deeper <br />into the property would hamper the future landscape design that will take place when the construction is complete. One of the <br />biggest appeals of the property at the time of purchase was the openness of the back yard and the fact that the garage did not <br />occupy that area. The second is the additional expense of the longer driveway if I have to move it back further. An attached <br />garage was originally considered however the alterations to the house to accommodate the attached garage put the project way <br />over budget. <br />Sorry for the delay I have had a very busy day; I hope this is sufficient, if not let me know. <br />David F Battisto <br />President <br />BridgeNet Technologies, LLC <br />Direct - 651.379.9333 <br />Office - 651.221.0112 <br />Fax - 651.221.0272 <br />From: Bryan Lloyd [mailto:bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us] <br />Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 1:15 PM <br />To: david <br />Subject: setback permit hearing comments <br />Hi, David. <br />I've attached a PDF of the Dcvclopment Revie�v Committce's coinments peYtaining to j�our proposal--the original is in the <br />mail. <br />Let inc kno�v if ��ou ha�-e any yucstions. <br />Bryan Lloyd <br />Associate City Planner <br />City of Roseville <br />651-792-7073 <br />bryan.11oydnci.r�se_y_ille.mn.us <br />10/10/2006 <br />