pf_03790 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.0 BACKGROUND: 4.1 In June 2001, the Roseville City Council unanimously approved a new 280-acre Master Plan and Renewal Strategy as well as an Alternate Urban Area Wide Review for the entire Twin lakes Redevelopment Area from approximately Cleveland (west) to Lincoln Drive (east) and from County Road C(south) to County Road C-2 (north). The City Council's action included a resolution approving an amendment to the Roseville Comprehensive Plan that established the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area as Business Park (BP). 4.2 In December 2003, the Roseville City Council selected Rottlund Homes as the Twin Lakes Master Developer. From February through July the Master Developer worked with the Council selected Stakeholders Panel to review and refine the Master Developer concepts. 4.3 In September 2004, Rottlund submitted an application (concept) for approval of an 80 acre mixed residential and retail/office General Concept Planned Unit Development to redevelop a portion of the Twin Lakes truck terminal area to be known as Phase 1 of Twin Lakes Redevelopment. 4.4 In October 2004, the Roseville Planning Commission considered the proposed Twin Lakes Master Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and General Concept Plan, recommending approval of the plan/project. 4.5 In January 2005, the Roseville City Council approved the General Concept Plan and all other supporting actions related to the Phase I Redevelopment. 4.6 In June 2005, the Roseville City Council approved the Final Development Plan and all other supportive actions related to the Phase I Redevelopment. 4.7 On August 10, 2006, the Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded that the 2005 Master Plan Amendment effectively served to amend the Comprehensive Plan, but did not achieve the required supermajority vote (4/5) of the City Council. 4.8 On October 6, 2006, the City Planner received and accepted muhiple applications from Rottlund Company, Inc. to redevelop approximately 58 acres within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area in a manner that the developer deemed consistent with the 2001 Master Plan. 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW: 5.1 Minnesota State Statute 473.865 subdivision (2) states, in part, "A local governmental unit shall not adopt any official control... which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan." For the purposes of reviewing and potentially approving this land-use application, the City of Roseville must determine whether the amendments sought to the official controls (rezoning, platting, vacations, etc.) do not conflict with our Comprehensive Plan. PF3790_RPCA_GeneralConcept_l 10106 Page 2 of 14