Laserfiche WebLink
5.2 The City of Roseville's Coinprehensive Plan currently designates the subject area as <br />`BP-Business Park." Furthermore, the Minnesota Court of Appeals' August 10, 2006 <br />ruling concluded that the City further amended the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the <br />Twin Lakes Business Park Master Plan (attached as Exhibit A) in 2001. The Master Plan <br />specifically states: "[this] new master plan amendment of 2001 will designate the areas as <br />`BP" — Business Park." The 2001 Master Plan also includes four future land-use maps <br />("Options 2, 3 and 4" and the "Twin Lakes AUAR Future Land Use Scenario") and <br />several pages of text describing future land-use scenarios and goals. The conclusion that <br />the intent of the 2001 Master Plan was to provide for a flexible mix of Business Park uses <br />is further supported in a letter from the former City of Roseville staff people (Dennis <br />Welsch and Cathy Bennett) who were the principle authors of the 2001 Master Plan. In <br />that letter (Attached as Exhibit B), Mr. Welsch and Ms. Bennett conclude that the Master <br />Plan was intended to provide a framework for a fleaible mix of Business Park uses and <br />that the current proposal is consistent with that plan. <br />5.3 Staff has concluded (with the input of the City Attorney's Office), that the underlying <br />Comprehensive Plan designation of the subject area is `BP — Business Park" in a manner <br />that is conceptually consistent with the mix of uses and stated goals that are described in <br />the maps and text of the 2001 Master Plan. <br />5.4 The uses envisioned within the Comprehensive Plan designation of "BP — Business Park" <br />include: office, office-laboratory, office-showroom-warehousing, bio-technical, <br />biomedical, high-tech softvvare and hardware production uses with support services such <br />as limited retail, health, fitness, lodging and multifamily housing. While not specifically <br />listed, it is presumed that "support services" would also include limited restaurant space. <br />5.5 The uses illustrated in the four maps and accompanying text of the 2001 Master Plan <br />include: manufacturing, office, high-tech flex, housing, medical, service mix and retail <br />mix. More specifically, those uses that are included solely in the Subject Area include: <br />manufacturing, office, high-tech flex, housing and medical. <br />5.6 The table in Exhibit C illustrates that sub-areas within the subject area (identified in the <br />2001 Master Plan as "Opportunity Areas 1, 2, 3 and 5") further define uses that were <br />envisioned within those sub-areas. By virtue of the fact that the land-uses described <br />within each sub-area differ among each referenced land-use map contained in the 2001 <br />Master Plan, staff has concluded that the spirit and intent of the 2001 Master Plan was to <br />provide for a mix of the prescribed uses in a flexible manner. In fact, among the ten <br />Goals and Policies included in the 2001 Master Plan is to "provide a flexible land use <br />plan (page 3)." <br />5.7 In addition to the ten Goals and Policies of the 2001 Master Plan (pages 2 and 3), the <br />Master Plan includes seven broad policies (pages 3 and 4) and twenty-four renewal <br />strategies (pages 4— 8). In staff's review of the applicant's proposal, no aspect of that <br />proposal has been identified as being in conflict with these goals, policies and strategies. <br />Exhibit D provides an analysis of the manner in which the proposal addresses the goals <br />of the 2001 Master Plan. <br />PF3790_RPCA_GeneralConcept_l 10106 Page 3 of 14 <br />