CC_Minutes_2013_0610 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 10, 2013 Page 27 Councilmember Willmus suggested that the open house be conducted at City Hall,but after further discussion, it was decided that this may give the impression to the public that it's a City project; and would also allow the flexibility for other meeting locations to avoid tainting the process. At the request of Councilmember Laliberte regarding line 27 stating that the open house "shall" be held at a public location, City Attorney Mark Gaughan clarified that this was the strongest language available, and no change was made. Councilmember McGehee expressed concern that any objections or issues were fully documented at the open house, while recognizing the difficulty in getting someone to sign off on the meeting summary. At the request of Councilmember Etten, discussion ensued regarding lines 45 —47 regarding the written summary; and determined that more specificity was not needed, and the language would remain as recommended by staff Councilmem- ber Etten also questioned the word "therefore" on line 18 and the need to include it, with City Attorney Gaughan advising that it referenced the previous sentence providing the basis for that requirement. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff provided a list of applicable addresses that provided a list of who was invited; but had no way of monitoring who attended the open house or who didn't. Mayor Roe suggested reference language in code, similar to Recycling as a Public Utility (e.g. Subdivision chapter 1101.02) providing for the necessary application data requiring an open house and requirements. e. Discuss Owasso School Property At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember Willmus provided an update for the public from the Closed Executive Session held earlier this evening related to ac- quisition of property, including the former Owasso School property at 934-950 Woodhill Drive and 2659 Victoria Street. Councilmember Willmus advised that the School Board of the Roseville School District No. 623 had formed a citizen task force to provide recommendation on the disposition of this school-owned property, with several recommendations made by the group to the Board. One of those recommendations was to potential- ly engage in the sale of the entire parcel to the City of Roseville; and one was to split the parcel and sell the southern portion of the parcel to the City of Roseville and possibly allow the City to acquire an option to purchase the remainder (north- ern half) at a later date; and the third option to offer the parcel for sale to any par- ty.