My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0617
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2013 10:12:53 AM
Creation date
7/16/2013 10:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/17/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 17, 2013 <br /> Page 9 <br /> great sense. Related to the proposed dog park, Councilmember Willmus ques- <br /> tioned if its proposed location was the best place, so close to residents. <br /> Mr. Schroeder advised that there had been interest from the neighborhood, with <br /> many currently using the tennis courts to throw balls around with their dogs; <br /> however, he noted that it was still an unknown if it made sense to create this type <br /> of a space. Mr. Schroeder noted that there were not funds to include all of the <br /> conceptual amenities, and also noted that this request was probably from a small <br /> segment of the neighborhood as well. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned the location of dog areas next to homes that may create a <br /> potential nuisance from noise; and suggested it might lend itself to a different lo- <br /> cation since it wasn't funded yet anyway. <br /> Councilmember Etten recognized that there were not funds allotted for all con- <br /> cepts at this time; however, he suggested that the parking lot relocation be a high <br /> priority; and questioned if the tennis courts, intended to be relocated in the future, <br /> were proposed for resurfacing or moving them at this time to allow phasing im- <br /> provements in the park without expending considerable funds for resurfacing <br /> them when they would later be removed for relocation. <br /> Mr. Brokke clarified that the intent was to use a portion of the allotted $275,000 <br /> for this park to move the tennis courts at this time to allow for future improve- <br /> ments. <br /> Councilmember Etten supported that intent, opining that he clearly couldn't sup- <br /> port a $50,000 to $75,000 expense to resurface the courts and later relocate them. <br /> Mr. Brokke advised that the intent was definitely for phasing it; noting that the <br /> existing parking lot was relatively new as well. <br /> Specific to Mayor Roe's concerns, Councilmember McGehee stated that, based <br /> on her experience, dog parks were not too noisy. <br /> Related to the proposed pickle ball area, Councilmember McGehee questioned <br /> their location in this park. Councilmember McGehee also suggested dollars be <br /> spend on park amenities other than the building, by reducing the size of the pro- <br /> posed building, and apply that money to the parking lot. Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee opined that it seemed to be more important to get the traffic out of the neigh- <br /> borhood in the immediate future. <br /> Mr. Schroeder advised that, in reviewing various layouts, an area for pickle ball <br /> was considered by the basketball court; and that the request for pickle ball ameni- <br /> ties had been heard for a number of parks, as it was becoming a popular activity. <br /> Mr. Schroeder advised that, while trying to accommodate the majority of neigh- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.