pf09-025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

19 4.0 BACKGROUND 20 4.1 In 2004, Roseville's City Council enacted a moratorium on new outdoor storage uses in z� the Twin Lakes redevelopment area, which included the subject property. Although the 22 moratorium did not specifically target such uses on this property, 1705 County Road C 2:� fell within the redevelopment area; consequently, Glenn Kloskin of Boater's Outlet could 2a not apply for the permanent conditional use approval. Instead, the only option for 2� allowing the outdoor storage of boats in this location was to approve it temporarily with 2s an Interim Use Permit. The moratorium has since been rescinded. 2� 2� 29 30 31 32 4.2 While the approved Interim Use Permit expired in 2007, Boater's Outlet has continued to operate without incident until today. Planning Division staff has been aware of the fact that the outdoor storage of boats has been a nonconforming use since 2007, but has not had the opportunity until recently to inform Mr. Kloskin that his previous approval was, by nature, temporary and that he needs to receive permanent approval of the CotvD�T�oNAL usE in order to bring the Boater's Outlet use into compliance with the zoning ordinance. 3:� 4.3 This coNDiTioNaL usE request has been prompted by the applicant's desire to continue 34 storing boats outside both for customers whose boats are awaiting repairs and the 35 seasonal storage of boats over the winter. 36 $.0 3� 5.1 3 �3 STAFF COMMENTS Section 1007.015 (Industrial Uses) of the City Code permits outdoor storage as a CotvD�T�oNAL uSE in the applicable General Industrial (I-2) District. 3y 5.2 Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning Commission ao and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a cotv��T�otvAL usE a � application: a2 a. 43 b. 44 C. 45 a6 d. a � e. a� f. Impact on traffic; Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4y Because consideration of these criteria is not a requirement of approving the previous 50 Interim Use Permit they have not been formally evaluated as they are in CoND�T�o1vAL usE � � requests. Instead of prospectively assessing the potential impact of a proposed use on 52 each of the above criteria, Planning Division staff has reviewed its records pertaining to 53 the Boater's Outlet use at this property during the past several years and determined that it 5� has had (and is expected in the future to have) no negative impacts on the external 55 criteria. 56 5.3 With respect to the more internal site considerations of criteria "c", the aerial photo 57 (included with this staff report as Attachment B) shows that the boats are tightly arranged 53 in the storage area of the parcel, and Mr. Kloskin proposes to continue this arrangement. 5� Roseville's Fire Marshal has confirmed that he does not have any concern about the PF09-025 RCA 102609 Page 2 of 3 � �