pf10-016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

—. �. recommends requiring the installation of at least two windows along the southern side wall to soften its visual impact. 5.8 Roseville's Development Review Committee, a body comprising staff from various City departments, met on July 15, 2010 to discuss the application and contributed the following comments: a. The construction of the proposed garage should not change the existing storm water drainage patterns in the area; b. Gutters and downspouts should be installed to direct rain water from the roof of the proposed garage northward, toward the interior of the property; c. The applicant should verify the location of the southern side property line (either by locating and exposing the iron markers in the corners of the property or by providing a survey) prior to issuance of the required building permit; and d. If any portion of the driveway/parking area: 1) remains after the removal of the existing garage and parking area behind the home; and 2) is not yet paved; it should be paved as part of this project. S.9 REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a coND�T�otvAL usE application: i. Impact on traffic; u. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; iii. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; iv. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; v. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and vi. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. a. Impact on traffic: The City Code prohibits any residential garage from being used for commercial purposes (whether as a commercial workshop or as a space for parking commercial vehicles or equipment). Since the proposed garage would continue to be used for the typical, daily and seasonal storage purposes on a residential property, Planning Division staff has determined that it would not have an adverse impact on the traffic in the area. b. Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: The Planning Division has determined that the proposed accessory structure is unrelated to the City's parks, streets, and other facilities, and so will not have an adverse impact on them. c. Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: The proposed accessory structure would not change the circulation on the property since it is essentially replacing the previous garage. Although the proposed building is larger than those found on the contiguous properties it would be a residential-type structure nonetheless. d. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: Although the current proposal seeks CotvDIT�oNaL usE approval to build the largest accessory structure allowed on a single-family residential property, the Planning Division has PF 10-016 RPCA 080410 Page 3 of 3