Laserfiche WebLink
-� <br />Bryan Lloyd <br />� <br />From: Dean Findell <br />Posted At: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:32 AM <br />Conversation: Dog daycare as an interim use at 1430 Co. Rd. C- Final Review <br />Posted To: DRC - Final Review <br />Subject: Dog daycare as an interim use at 1430 Co. Rd. C- Final Review <br />Dean Findell---Engineering <br />Although they address the existing screening of the outdoor area, do we need to ask for more? <br />Dean Findell <br />Confidentialit�� Statement: The documents accompanyiilg this transmission coutain confidential inforn�ation that is legally <br />pri��ileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above. If you are not the intended <br />recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure. copying. distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these <br />documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this infonnation in error. please notify the sender immediately and arrange for <br />the returu or destruction of these documents. <br />From: Bryan Lloyd <br />Posted At: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:54 PM <br />Posted To: DRC - Final Review <br />Conversation: Dog daycare as an interim use at 1430 Co. Rd. C- Final Review <br />Subject: Dog daycare as an interim use at 1430 Co. Rd. C- Final Review <br />The proposed physical plans are here, and you can find more to read on the subject here and here. <br />There was lots of concern at the initial review about noise from barking and odors from waste. I'm a little <br />conflicted about it myself because the applicant's materials seems to address the noise issue is a very straight- <br />forward way and their knowledge/experience with the field of dog daycare leads them to conclude that dog <br />daycares are not noise nuisances. And I'm not too versed in the odor aspects either; I'll plan to do a little <br />research on the topic. <br />I didn't see this addressed in the application, but the applicant plans to own the property through a lease-to-own <br />kind of scenario. That makes a stinky warehouse building their problem if they don't adequately protect the <br />floor from dog waste. If indoor sanitation isn't regulated by a third-party, can/should we make the installation of <br />some sanitation system a condition of approval? If so, what should that be? <br />In any case, I would argue that the use is, indeed, allowed by the zoning ordinance; "dog Kennels" are <br />conditional uses in all inustrial districts. Now, it could be that a kennel (or this use, which I would think is less <br />