My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-07-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-07-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2013 4:30:39 PM
Creation date
7/18/2013 4:23:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/23/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
102 Discussion included an explanation of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area <br />103 public improvements scheduled to begin the week of July 8, 2013; status of the <br />104 County Road B -2 Pathway Project and recent open house meetings with residents <br />105 to address drainage and preliminary plans, with the next step to present revised <br />106 plans based on those discussions at the July PWETC meeting, followed by <br />107 presentation to the Parks & Recreation Commission in August and the City <br />108 Council in September for this projected 2014 project, and including Victoria <br />109 Street as well; and approaching Ramsey County for submission of a request for <br />110 4their cost participation based on recent discussions held by County <br />111 Co missioners and their interest in enhancing pedestrian efforts throughout the <br />112 are . s. Bloom expressed hope that the state may be interested in sharing in <br />113 50% of the sidewalk costs; and seeking an amendment to their transportation plan <br />114 over the winter months to include their participation. Ms. Bloom advised that the <br />115 second meeting with affected residents along County Road B -2 held less <br />116 opposition than the first meeting; with main concerns drainage and the route; <br />117 estimating that approximately 60% of those residents were supportive, with the <br />118 remaining 40% in opposition, based unscientifically on her conversations with <br />119 residents at those informational meetings. Ms. Bloom advised that staff was <br />120 attempting to focus on individual issues, and anticipated receiving good feedback <br />121 from the PWETC at their July meeting. <br />122 <br />123 Mr. Schwartz advised that the PWETC, at their June meeting, had requested <br />124 mapping of stenciling during the stormwater presentation and discussion; and <br />Page 3 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.