Laserfiche WebLink
125 advised that it is in the process of being revised, and staff would provide the <br />126 updated map to the Commission at a later meeting. <br />127 <br />128 Additional discussion included the 2013 Pavement Management Program (PMP) <br />129 mill and overlay project scheduled for this summer; action by the City Council to <br />130 transfer the Recycling Utility from the Administration to the Public Works <br />131 Department; and recent news reports on the problems encountered from sanitary <br />132 wipes going into the sanitary sewer system and plugging up pumps; and another <br />133 news story on sewer lining applications, as currently being done in Roseville. <br />134 <br />135 5. Pathway Master Plan <br />136 Ms. Bloom briefly reviewed the updates by staff for priority segments as <br />137 previously discussed for the PWETC's Pathway Master Plan Build -out Plan from <br />138 the initial 2008 Plan; as detailed in the Attachments to the June 25, 2013 staff <br />139 report, and seeking feedback from the PWETC on those segments and what <br />140 additional fine- tuning was indicated. Ms. Bloom clarified that this was a very <br />141 preliminary list with numerous ass ptions; and was only inte ed as a platform <br />142 for PWEC brainstorming and revision. Attachments are as foll s: <br />143 • Attachment A Pathw aster Plan Priority Table <br />144 • Attachment B Parks Renewal Program Potential Pathway Project ap <br />145 • Attachment C Pathway Master Plan Priority Project Map <br />146 • Attachment D 2013 Pathway Map <br />147 <br />148 At the request of Member Felice, Mr. Schwartz advised that the pathway into the <br />149 parking lot south of Har Mar Mall currently without curb cuts were on the 2013 <br />150 work plan. <br />151 <br />160 Member DeBenedet expressed appreciation for the considerable amount of work <br />161 Ms. Bloom had put into this Build -out Plan, opining that it would be very helpful. <br />162 Member DeBenedet suggested the first step would be for the PWETC to agree on <br />163 scoring or ranking, even though those scores may need future re- evaluation; and <br />164 those amenable for on -road versus off -road facilities, based on other components <br />165 and /or financial considerations. <br />166 <br />167 Members discussed how those major corridors already having a sidewalk on one <br />168 side, but not both sides, should be prioritized (e.g. Lexington Avenue; Fairview <br />169 Avenue; County Road C, etc.) based on safety, utility and traffic considerations. <br />170 Comparisons were made between current priority rationale and that of the 1980's <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />