Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 8, 2013 <br /> Page 26 <br /> for the bottom rung and not achieving being 100% in line with the ten (10) peer <br /> cities. Mayor Roe advised that he could support a range of 98% - 102%. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the option to utilize reserves to offset this <br /> burden was interesting, since he had been under the impression that in the past, <br /> those reserves were untouchable or required a thorough review of the City's re- <br /> serve ratio. While not sure that was a direction he would chose to go, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus opined that if the City set a target to attain, he would question <br /> if using reserves should attain it. While remaining open to further discussion go- <br /> ing forward, Councilmember Willmus expressed his strong opinion that it was vi- <br /> tal that these decisions needed to be weighed within the overall budget picture. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that it would be difficult for the City to set a pol- <br /> icy at a certain percent and then realize a year later that it couldn't attain that goal. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that a policy could be phased in when implemented; however, <br /> he didn't think the policy itself was tied to the budget or current funding. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte advised that she was looking forward to the upcoming <br /> Department Head budget discussions to hear their specific perspectives on how <br /> much money they had, other challenges before them, and where this issue fell <br /> within that context, recognizing that many of the positions did not fall equally <br /> across the organization. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe as to whether that affected where the policy was set, <br /> Councilmember Laliberte responded in the negative, noting that it would depend <br /> on each annual budget. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested that his goal was mid-range based on his discus- <br /> sions with other communities; and while that may appear vague or not provide a <br /> sufficient comfort level for the organization, he found many organizations were <br /> using that model. In removing the merit piece, Councilmember Etten opined that <br /> he didn't see that as a cut, since he would bury that right back into staff pay as <br /> part of the foundation for the main compensation process. Councilmember Etten <br /> further opined that the range would need to be part of training for the City Coun- <br /> cil, and based on past steps for prioritizing, when a policy was set, the City Coun- <br /> cil looked at steps to put that into place. Councilmember Etten opined that he <br /> didn't think using reserves was the answer, and stated that he was more focused <br /> on how to fund it in 2014 rather than solving the 2013 problem. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she bought into the compounding problem; <br /> and opined that she didn't like vague ideas for employment structures in munici- <br /> pal government; opining that there had to be a realistic range for people to see and <br /> measure and how it was arrived at, and adjusted every 5-10 years. Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee stated that she differed with Councilmember Willmus in his percep- <br /> tion that reserves were untouchable, since in the past, those reserves had been ad- <br />