My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2013 10:42:05 AM
Creation date
7/24/2013 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/25/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion included current and/or future use of a pathway by university students <br /> ad alternate routes used now; and recognizing that Snelling Avenue was the only <br /> connection available to many residents in this area. <br /> #14 Hamline Avenue <br /> Ms. Bloom reviewed the proposed bituminous trail south of County Road B-2 to <br /> County Road C in three (3) different sections. <br /> Discussion included on-road options for this Hamline segment; higher priorities <br /> south of County Road C based on children safety in that area; and constraints with <br /> narrow sidewalks south of County Road C to the Ramsey County Library- <br /> Roseville branch. <br /> #34 Alta Vista Drive <br /> With concurrence of the PWETC, Ms. Bloom suggested combining this with the <br /> previous Dale Street/Reservoir Woods discussion. <br /> 1 County Road D <br /> Ms. Bloom noted Ramsey County had this roadway reconstruction project in their <br /> 5 year plan however it had been pushed out a number of times. <br /> Segments with Scores Less than 90 <br /> In reviewing these segments, Ms. Bloom questioned if there were any needing <br /> more refining or adjustments; and whether the PWETC wanted her to estimate <br /> costs or other components at this time. <br /> Member Gjerdingen noted that, from the perspective of narrowing focus, <br /> disregarding these ten (10) projects would allow more focus on the higher ranked <br /> priorities. <br /> With concurrence of members, Chair Vanderwall suggested disregarding them for <br /> now, if the Parks Master Plan didn't have them included on one of their <br /> constellations. <br /> In reviewing #38 (Judith to Iona Connection), Member DeBenedet advised that it <br /> was included in Constellation L; with Chair Vanderwall noting that this was very <br /> good for that neighborhood, as they currently had no outlet other than Western <br /> Avenue. <br /> After further discussion, it was the consensus that Ms. Bloom provide some <br /> information on all of them if time allowed. <br /> Next Step <br /> Based on tonight's direction and discussions, Ms. Bloom advised that she would <br /> further refine the segments, get more accurate numbers, and correct map errors; <br /> and sought further direction from the PWETC. <br /> Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.