My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0715
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2013 8:21:33 AM
Creation date
7/29/2013 8:21:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/15/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kari Collins <br /> From: Tam McGehee <tam @mcgehee.info> <br /> Sent: Sunday,July 14, 2013 4:55 PM <br /> To: *RVCouncil; Pat Trudgeon; Kari Collins <br /> Subject: Changes to 7/8 Draft Minutes <br /> I am sorry I did not get these changes in before Wednesday noon, but I would like to make the following <br /> changes. I am submitting them at this time so that the Council members will have an opportunity to see <br /> them before Monday's meeting as I would like to have them included at that time. <br /> Page numbers and lines are based on the printed copy in the packet for the 7/15 meeting. <br /> Lines 8-24, Page 27: <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she bought into the compounding problem; and opined that <br /> she didn't like vague ideas for public government and employment structures in municipal <br /> government; opining that there had to be a realistic range for people to see and measure and how <br /> it was arrived at, and adjusted every 5-10 years. Councilmember McGehee stated that she <br /> differed with Councilmember Willmus in his perception that reserves were untouchable, since in <br /> the past, those reserves were had been adjusted and touched, sometimes at the suggestion of <br /> Councilmember Willmus himself. While not supporting a recurring use of reserves for this type <br /> of problem, Councilmember McGehee opined that she could support it as a one-time option <br /> when the City found itself in a year with levy limits. Councilmember McGehee questioned how <br /> the City could continue to abuse its employees by continuing to have this discussion and yet not <br /> doing anything about it moving forward; while at the same time expecting staff to continue their <br /> dedication to the City. Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of establishing a policy, <br /> opining that from her understanding, all Department Heads had concurred with this proposal <br /> across the board; whichand that should serve to provide sufficient direction for the City Council <br /> with staffs support; and eliminate the need for any further discussion ofn this particular policy <br /> issue. <br /> Lines 5-13, Page 22: <br /> While noting that it was valuable, Councilmember McGehee opined that the information <br /> provided by Springsted at tonight's interview was redundant and had already been provided in <br /> written form; and represented nothing new. In recognizing that the person the City may work <br /> with at Springsted Brimeyer/Fursman would not be the representative at tonight's interview, <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed disappointment in her perception that Mr. Unmacht may be <br /> difficult to work with as a facilitator and as he appeared to be a more of an aggressive <br /> salesperson which was ; and not what she was looking for at-all in this process. Councilmember <br /> McGehee advised that she saw this as a team process, and did not get that impression from <br /> tonight's interview with Springsted. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.