CC_Minutes_2013_0715 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 15,2013 Page 8 value for Roseville. While taking additional staff time, Mr. Schwartz opined that it remained beneficial to all parties. Mr. Schwartz referenced the Department's Strategic Plan outlining a future tech- nician level person in rights-of-way; and opined that between that relationship and other permits and related fees implemented over the last few years, the position could be funded without any additional tax support, with the net of all those com- ponents fully funding the positions and making up for any negative impacts on staff time. At the request of Mayor Roe as to the benefits for additional collaborative efforts with neighboring communities for specialty engineering services versus contract- ing out for those services allowing staff to remain focused on other items, Mr. Schwartz responded that there would always be a need for specialty engineering (e.g. stormwater or traffic) beyond staffs in-house expertise. Mr. Schwartz ad- vised that it was nice to retain those relationships due to the ebb and flow of workloads and to keep those channels open. Mr. Schwartz advised that this was how it had been left with the City of Maplewood for the time being. Mayor Roe questioned if the Department had opportunities to work with other communities similar to capital purchases through the state bid process, or to con- sider contractual relationships with other communities to benefit all through a larger bidding process. While Mr. Schwartz recognized that as an interesting concept, he concurred with Mayor Roe that this would take staff time to manage it; but if cities developed a pool of resources, he also saw a negative perception and resentment within the consultant community for such a consortium. At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Schwartz confirmed that he anticipated funding for the Environmental Specialist position from enterprise funds (e.g. Recycling, Stormwater and others) and requiring no tax funded support beyond that allot- ment. Mr. Schwartz advised that this was proposed under previous direction and guidelines given under a maximum 3%levy increase scenario. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Schwartz provided an update on the City's inflow and infiltration (I & I); drawdown of the first surcharge allowed by the Metropolitan Council from state bonding monies for current work on the City's manholes and sewer lining to reduce infiltration; pending impacts of the June 21 — 22 storms to determine if the City of Roseville had exceeded its maxi- mum allowed; and further research on the significant lift station cycling during the summer storms that indicated a problem still existed in the system—with spe- cific locations yet to be identified.