My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9735
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9700
>
res_9735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:40:19 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:23:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9735
Resolution Title
Receiving Feasibility Reports on 2000 Improvements and Ordering Public Hearings
Resolution Date Passed
1/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />3. The Council shall meet at the City Hall, 2660 Civic Center Drive, in said City, on <br />February 14, 2000, at 7:15 p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the <br />proposed improvements under and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, <br />Chapter 429, and the Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the <br /> <br />time, place, and purpose of that meeting to be published twice in the official <br />newspaper, Roseville Review, which publications shall be a week apart, and the second <br />publication shall be not less than three days before the date of the hearing. <br /> <br />4. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: <br />(see attachments). <br /> <br />5. The general nature, estimated cost and area proposed to be assessed for Improvements <br />P-OQ-02, Neighborhoods 32, 34, 35 and 36 is determined to be as stated in the foregoing <br />notice, as fully as though the same were separately set forth and resolved herein <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br />Wiski and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mastel, <br />Maschka, Goedeke, Wiski and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: none. <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.